Not imagined. YOU are the one who used the word "intentionally" to describe Alex Murphy's edits of this article as "deceptive." How do you know his intents?
A dodge on your part?
So you dodge my questions, eh? Why won't you answer them?
Here, I'll repeat them:
Cothrige, #162: ...the initial editing on the posting of the article was, I think, perhaps intentionally deceptive. But, when people want to believe something badly enough they will grab anything they can and twist whatever comes along to their own ends.
How do you know this? How are you able to glean the intentional inward motives of strangers you don't know? Doesn't Scripture say that only God knows the inward heart -- that man looks @ only what's going on on the outside? (1 Samuel 16:7)
Here you condemned Alex Murphy for being "intentionally deceptive" -- and then you act all offended when somebody points out that this spirit of condemnation is found on your keyboard breath...and then you proceed to repeatedly accuse me for pointing out this breath on you -- that I'm being "false."
Tell us, Cothrige, how are you able to discover inward motivations of strangers? Perhaps you'd like to apologize to Alex Murphy now?
Not that I condemned Alex Murphy for editing the initial post, but for a particular attitude about John 6. And, even if I had accused Alex Murphy of something, or even condemned him...
Can't make up your mind if you condemned Alex Murphy, eh? Or what you condemned him for, eh? (Let us know when one side of your brain communicates with the other & comes to a decision)
NOBODY wants to talk about Acts 15!