Posted on 04/12/2011 7:55:27 AM PDT by bkaycee
Your sect’s meetings are empty and unfulfilling.
I made no such references.
You are reading beyond the words written.
But that’s your business and you are free to try to make things more comfortable for certain preferred posters - its your forum.
Perhaps it was ignorance that led your mind to the gutter:
Ejaculation - Definition of Ejaculation in Roman Catholicism
An ejaculation, sometimes also called an aspiration, is a short prayer meant to be memorized and repeated throughout the day.
http://catholicism.about.com/od/prayers/g/Ejaculation.htm
Are you claiming that you are not using sects as a play on the word sex, e.g. “bad sects?”
Invocation or Ejaculation to the Most Holy Name of Jesus
This simple ejaculation to the Holy Name of Jesus is a wonderful short way to give praise and to pray at all times.
“Blessed be the most holy Name of Jesus without end!”
.
.
.
.
.
http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/liturgicalyear/prayers/view.cfm?id=893
.
Prayer Source: Prayer Book, The by Reverend John P. O’Connell, M.A., S.T.D. and Jex Martin, M.A., The Catholic Press, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, 1954
No dice. There is no reference on that link to a premature form of it.
GOOD DOG!, and I guess good kitty. lol
I am following the rules.
Sects and sectarianism are the terms used by Catholics for apostate and heretical groups (i.e. most non-catholics).
The use of strong language to condemn evils has been a hallmarlk of the RF. Typically such strong language is aimed against my Church. I am simply adopting that same tactic.
The meaning of my post is always clean and on point for those who read the actual words that are written - but those who improperly change some of the letters will see what they choose to see.
But if you see any post use words, references to words - or a play on words that would be inappropriate for the young or elderly, ping me.
Well, the post you deleted walked through the argument, warning everyone to use the polite prayerful meaning of the word, and then agreeing with Mad Dawg’s point that Quix starts all “dialog” with his preconceived conclusions, condemns any attempt to walk through a rational analysis, and rushes to the end prematurely, at which point he gets all excited and uses exclamation points and ALL CAPS and bold and multicolored fonts to shout halleluia and amen and such (ejaculation).
One could therefore conclude that according to Catholic use of the word, Quix cuts off dialog and discussion that would develop the ideas and foster a rich understanding, and therefore Quix suffers from premature exclamation or premature ejaculation.
In the age of tv ads during familt hours for viagra and the pill and ky jelly, it is a bit much to conclude that a reference - in this context - to “premature ejaculation” of prayer violates any rules.
I can understand that ejaculation is highly subject to mi-use and misinterpretation. As a matter of fact I hesitated to use it knowing that some here would love to use the fact of its Catholic usage as another stick with which to beat us. So I will no longer use it.
Use of the plural and possessive forms of the word “sect” is particularly appropriate when discussing religion.
I will continue to do so, as sects and sectarianism are the words we often use in the Church to describe non-Catholic groups and persons.
Non-catholics also use these terms. The founding fathers also used these terms.
If a well-known FR bloviator uses the word “we” while bloviating,
And someone else tweaks the bloviator”s comment by asking “is that the royal ‘we’ “,
And another person then (mindful of the know-it-tone bloviators self-righteous tone) cleverly notes that the bloviator likely thinks his ‘we’ is royal,
This is banned potty langauge?
If so, I have seen that dialogue hundreds of times at FR, and so it is a surprise.
But those in sects have likely been hitting their abuse button, which is why it has popped up.
If a well-known FR bloviator uses the word “we” while bloviating,
And someone else tweaks the bloviator”s comment by asking “is that the royal ‘we’ “,
And another person then (mindful of the know-it-all bloviators self-righteous tone) cleverly notes that the bloviator likely thinks his ‘we’ is royal,
This is banned potty langauge?
If so, I have seen that dialogue hundreds of times at FR, and so it is a surprise.
But those in sects have likely been hitting their abuse button, which is why it has popped up.
The term "we" used as a play on the noun "wee" can be potty language depending on the context, e.g. "he thinks his we is royal."
This is fascinating. Thanks to nws for enlightening us on Romanist terminology.
Quix- I’m thinking this goes a long ways to explaining the pedophile problem that exists amongst Romanists. If their theological language is coterminous with sexual language this association can lead to actions in which a person believes that the act in the natural sphere somehow relates to a theological goodness. This would be especially prevalent amongst those involved in priestcraft because they are always working in both spheres.
What say you?
And oh yes, one important point:
When X posts that he participates in a religious community but does not disclose that group’s affiliation or denomination or non-denominational status,
And then X posts insults and smears aimed at the doctrine and beliefs of Y’s declared group,
It seems quite sensible and prudent for Y to refer to “your sect” when criticizing (in like manner) the doctrine and beliefs found in X’s posts.
Wow! Excellent observation. Until today, I never knew that word had a religious connection.
Your sect’s perversions are an abomination and offensive to God. Apostasy is evil.
Many of us are not in the group think mode. We have an individual relationship with our Lord Jesus Christ.
IOW:
When that bloviator uses We,
he gives the appearance
that he pretends to royalty
and that his We,
as used therein,
is therefore royal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.