“All that I posted has massive support of the whole of the scriptures.”
Then why is so hard for you to cite a few verses?
“You posted not one single reference in support of your bizzare contention of handshake covenants being supported by the word”
That’s a lie, I posted multiple scriptures which connect “hand striking” with the taking of a debt or making a surety, which you apparently ignored.
Words such as "false" "wrong" "error" do not attribute motive.
Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.
No, you posted scriptures CONDEMNING hand striking, and tried to pretend that they didn’t.
You are being an agent of confusion here.
Every verse that mentions hand striking condemns it.
Exd 24:8 And Moses took the blood, and sprinkled [it] on the people, and said, Behold the blood of the covenant, which the LORD hath made with you concerning all these words.
.
Zec 9:11 As for thee also, by the blood of thy covenant I have sent forth thy prisoners out of the pit wherein [is] no water.
.
Hebr 12:24 And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than [that of] Abel.
.
Hebr 13:20 Now the God of peace, that brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great shepherd of the sheep, through the blood of the everlasting covenant
.
Mat 26:28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
.
Mar 14:24 And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.
.
1Cr 11:25 After the same manner also [he took] the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink [it], in remembrance of me.
.
Hebr 9:18 Whereupon neither the first [testament] was dedicated without blood.
.
Hebr 9:20 Saying, This [is] the blood of the testament which God hath enjoined unto you.
.
Getting the picture yet?