Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

No, you posted scriptures CONDEMNING hand striking, and tried to pretend that they didn’t.

You are being an agent of confusion here.

Every verse that mentions hand striking condemns it.


459 posted on 03/26/2011 11:55:34 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

“No, you posted scriptures CONDEMNING hand striking, and tried to pretend that they didn’t.”

First, those Scriptures are condemning more than just hand striking, since there is always an additional connection to some other activity which reveals the reason for the condemnation. Also, even if the striking is condemned in that context, the fact that it is so many times associated with business transactions demonstrates that it WAS a practice of the time, which you keep trying to deny.

As for your citations about blood covenants, there is no description in those verses that matches what you previously claimed, that of cutting fingers and mingling blood. Given the Old Covenant’s strict laws concerning blood and ritual purity, I’d say the burden is pretty high for you to prove that is what was being done. In fact, all the verses you cite have to do with the very specific covenants between God and man, and not with business transactions or daily affairs. On top of that, the covenants weren’t sealed by the method you specify, but rather by the blood of a sacrifice, which is an entirely different thing.

Where is the evidence that the practice you asserted (similar to childish “blood brother” rituals), was the standard practice of that day and place for sealing deals or contracts?


462 posted on 03/26/2011 1:22:06 PM PDT by Boogieman (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson