[Quix]

Thanks, The one in 575 pushes the Darby nonsense off the cliff. It also makes clear that regardless of Vatican complicity in using such notions to its ends . . . the FACTS ARE

the Dispy Pre-Mil Rapture perspective has been around FROM THE EARLY CHURCH.

This article solidly documents it to 306-373.

Anyone claiming otherwise after that posting will be obviously shown to be dealing in something other than THE TRUTH.

However, some of them seem to have as crazy a DAFFYNITIONARY as the RC’s so I’m not holding my breath expecting honorable, honest, congruent and reasonable dialogue consistent with history or truth any more than they seem to be willing to write consistent with Scripture.

Nor will I be holding my breath waiting for an apology regarding all their harshly very pointedly personal and totally unwarranted, unjustified assaults on such matters.

Such may have become such a !!!TRADITION!!! that even the RM unconsciously ignores them any more. LOL.

[CynicalBear]

>> Such may have become such a !!!TRADITION!!! that even the RM unconsciously ignores them any more. LOL.<<

They weren’t’ ignored this morning. I got one that was visous. They pulled it and even pulled my reply because I had quoted the post to me.

[Cronos]

Dispy Pre-Mil Rapture perspective has been around FROM THE EARLY CHURCH.

I guess they mean the perspective was there before Domitian.

What is funny though is that the Rapture concept only was invented in the 1800s by some Scots