Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NavyCanDo
The problem is that Scripture is being denied. True Christians can have differences about the timing of the Rapture, whether the Antichrist will be a Muslim, etc. But when someone blatantly denies the Bible, that is not a Christian.

The Bible clearly and undeniably states that there will be an event where Jesus removes His true church from earth. To deny that is to willfully and knowingly deny God's word. A Christian is not going to do that.

And if that part is being denied, then so are other parts. Like the salvation parts and how nobody can enter the kingdom of Heaven without knowing Christ as Savior.

48 posted on 02/13/2011 10:15:46 AM PST by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: GiovannaNicoletta
The Bible clearly and undeniably states that there will be an event where Jesus removes His true church from earth. To deny that is to willfully and knowingly deny God's word. A Christian is not going to do that.

Who is arguing differently? No one here denies the 2nd Coming. It is your ilk that invents all kinds of fiction regarding multiple comings and calls it Truth.

True Christians can have differences about the timing of the Rapture,

Here you claim that all the believers and saints of old up are not True Christians because they don't believe in Darby's Folley which wasn't in existence until the mid 1800s.

The word "rapture" isn't even in the Bible yet you condemn both Calvin and Arminius, Augustine and Erasmus, Sproul and Charles Finney, Spurgeon, Hodge, Wesley brothers, Isaac Newton, Tyndale, Luther, Edwards, Whitefield, Barnes, J.I. Packer, B.B. Warfield - you condemn them all to Hell because they didn't wet their pants in anticipation of the Antichrist. You can't even name a single theologian before Darby that ever taught Dispensationalism so I guess millions of people who loved the LORD and put their trust in Him are burning in Hell because they didn't worship Hal Lindsey.

Anyone who denies the salvation of the great theologians of our time and that of centuries before us is someone I can't break bread with. You have absolutely no knowledge of what it is to be a child of Christ when you condemn everyone for not buying into your Neo-gnostic Narcissistic Eschatology.

I'm sorry and I am very disappointed in you. I thought we just a disagreement where we could compare our understanding of the Scriptures, not that you would try to revive the Inquisition and call me a child of Hell.



Any further proof necessary that Dispensationalists have no love for the Church of our LORD?

58 posted on 02/13/2011 3:12:44 PM PST by The Theophilus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson