[topcat54]

The sources are cited in Holly Deo’s article.

There are no original sources cited for the claim that are independently verifiable. It's a typical futurist hack job. Another example of whisper down the lane.

[Quix]

Yet again we see the

REPLACEMENTARIAN Alice’s rabbit hole has a lot in common with the

Vatican Cult’s Alice’s rabbit hole.

One criteria/standard for each blasphemous cult, a very different one for others.

When the sources are uncomfortable, pretend they are unverifiable.

What rot.

None of the REPLACEMENTARIANS have ever explained how

DAMASCUS was destroyed in AD 70 . . . and never lived in again . . .

Nor the global government including every people group—did NOT happen in AD70.

The list could go on and on and on.

[Cronos]

Topcat --> I wonder at times if the lexically challenged ones will now join the Raelians or the Scientologists. They've probably already been thrown out of the ELCA or WELS and then the PCUSA, ECUSA etc for standard "foot-in-mout-ites"

It's incredible that what they think is knowledge is just parroted stock-phrases, stock-photographs and stock-insults. They've not answered a single one of your questions now, just tossed insults and pictures and "burning in the b" responses.