The answer is that it didn't have to be because it was understand there was no difference between killing an unborn child and born person as proven by laws in Exodus 21:22-25:
“If men fight, and hurt a woman with child, so that she gives birth prematurely, yet no harm follows, he shall surely be punished accordingly as the woman’s husband imposes on him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. But if any harm follows, then you shall give life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe."
And, why are you whining about protestants allegedly being soft on abortion when you trying to deny there is a Biblical prohibition against it?
You wrote:
“The answer is that it didn’t have to be because it was understand there was no difference between killing an unborn child and born person as proven by laws in Exodus 21:22-25:”
I asked where abortion was mentioned. It is mentioned no where in the Bible. Thus, the correct answer is that it is not mentioned.
“And, why are you whining about protestants allegedly being soft on abortion when you trying to deny there is a Biblical prohibition against it?”
I never denied that there was a Biblical prohibition against abortion. I asked where in the Bible is it mentioned. Those are two entirely different things. Learn to read. Did you attend a government school?
When you learn how to read you might want to pick up Charles Provan’s The Bible and Birth Control. Provan is a Protestant.