If you even understood the first thing about evolution you would understand that.
Fossils from 3 million years ago suggest discrete species, just one that HAPPENS to look like what you would expect a human to look like that had only half as much distance from a common ancestor as a human.
If the evolutionary model were an accurate predictor of reality, then that is exactly what you would expect from fossils 3 million years ago. And there they are.
Just as when they looked for a shoreline around the time tetrapods were evolving, darned if they didn't find a “transitional” that looked like half a fish and half a salamander.
And without energy from the sun, evolution is not possible. So solar nuclear activity is part of evolution? (It starts getting absurd when we extend and twist definitions.)
No, individual development is not part of “the central dogma of molecular biology.” It’s not evolutionary change.
Further, if evolution were true, transitional species would vastly outnumber currently known species.
There is no record of these intermediate species.