And without energy from the sun, evolution is not possible. So solar nuclear activity is part of evolution? (It starts getting absurd when we extend and twist definitions.)
No, individual development is not part of “the central dogma of molecular biology.” It’s not evolutionary change.
Further, if evolution were true, transitional species would vastly outnumber currently known species.
There is no record of these intermediate species.
That is the very essence of evolution, something it is increasingly obvious you don't even have a rudimentary understanding of.
Natural selection acts upon genetic variation. Genetic variation in a population is created due to imperfect replication of DNA between parent and child.
The central dogma of molecular biology is that genetic DNA is transcribed into RNA that is translated into a chain of amino acids (a protein) that performs a function. Now that I explained THAT to you, perhaps you can explain to me why you thought it was relevant to the discussion?
Every species is a “transitional” from what came before to what will come after.
There are records after records of these “transitionals”, I have already mentioned two different ones.
Do you think if you put your fingers firmly enough in your ears close your eyes and chant “NAH NAH NAH” the examples will cease to exist?