1) I have a Catholic on this site tell me the scriptures contain errors (several times) and post the references . You ignore that.
2) I post a link to Catholic Answers that shows 40% do not believe in the inerrancy of scripture and this is illustrated by their answers. You ignore that.
3) I post an article by the Times of London that arrives at the same conclusion and you said that is wrong.
4) I post the Dei Verbum which is quoted in the Times of London and clearly shows a transition from the inerrant word of God to the Church. And your response is this is just a bunch of what the MSM says?!?
So much for serious scholarship.
Your excellent evidence once again reveals the stubborn fact that the RCC says one thing, then another, and yet another, all depending on the phase of the moon and the time of day.
For every statement of doctrine, Rome can and does produce an opposing statement of doctrine, equally affirmed.
No wonder Rome grants thousands of annulments each year. Now they're married. Now they're not.
It's really rather convenient.
When they're discussing Catholic doctrine with someone, no matter what the non-Catholic says, they're always wrong.
And the Catholic can *prove* it with quotes from the CCC to back himself (or herself) up.