Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: topcat54; cinciella
What is foolish is reading one set of promises in isolation from the rest of the promises, and the explanation of the real meaning of those promises. Some folks, for example, read Genesis 17 as if the New Testament didn’t exist or was irrelevant. That was not the approach of the apostles who interpreted the promises in the new covenant context, once for all time. Reading the Bible “dispensationally” is foolishness.

Well then, how about giving us your "reading" of Jeremiah 31, 32 and 33. Do you believe God is speaking of the "church" here or of Israel?

1,165 posted on 01/19/2011 5:56:16 PM PST by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1080 | View Replies ]


To: boatbums; cinciella
Well then, how about giving us your "reading" of Jeremiah 31, 32 and 33. Do you believe God is speaking of the "church" here or of Israel?

The focus of all prophecy is Jesus Christ, not Israel or the Church per se. IOW, the Bible is Christocentric, not Israelocentric. So, if you turn to a prophecy and ask, “how can I see Israel in this prophecy,” rather than, “how can I see Jesus in this prophecy,” you're starting off on the wrong foot.

So, how do you see Jesus in Jeremiah? After this we can talk about Israel if necessary.

1,167 posted on 01/19/2011 6:06:00 PM PST by topcat54 ("Dispensationalism -- an error of Biblical proportions.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson