teppe, your comments reflect a gross ignorance of the title. Jesus Christ is the Greek derived from the underlying Hebrew - Yeshua Hamashiach. Jesus needed NO annointing - as God in flesh he was already annointed -the Chosen One.
Obviously God the Father .... consequently, if God and Christ were co-equal as per the Nicene Creed .... then Jesus Christ could not be described as the “Christ” since there would have been no reason for him to annoint himself.
teppe - at least LEARN the correct definitions of the Persons of the Trinity if you are going to argue it - not morg polemic. You are making a fool of your self through this twisted logic
Go to any lexicon and you’ll see that teppe is quite correct in his comment on “Christ” meaning “anointed one”.
“Obviously God the Father .... consequently, if God and Christ were co-equal as per the Nicene Creed .... then Jesus Christ could not be described as the “Christ” since there would have been no reason for him to annoint himself.”
And his logic is in line with Christ’s own words.
The ever-present foolishness within the theological drivel from Mormon apologists is immense. Seeing the arrogance within the foolishness gives the creepy feeling of being embarrassed for the Mormon apologist. IMO the hallmark of heresies that lead to the creation of a cult like Mormonism is the blind arrogance fostered in followers.