Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: teppe

Um, Mormon, the Mormon jesus, according to your founder and subsequent leadership, was sired by the sunoon of a god and goddess who had been mortals and gained the attributes of godhood, then were appointed as god(s) over the earth. You may not like the term ‘trinity’ but it is not likely that we ought accept teaching from you since the jesus of your religion had to earn the attributes of godhhod, as taught by those who fabricated your religion.


47 posted on 01/08/2011 10:27:34 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

MHG ...

Get off thee drugs ... your understanding and/or reasoning is an embarassment


48 posted on 01/08/2011 10:31:06 PM PST by teppe (... for my God ... for my Family ... for my Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN

The truth is that the name “Christ” is an anglisized version of the Greek “Christos” which is a translation of the Hebrew “Messiah” which meanes the “Anointed One”.

“Christ” means the “Anointed One”!

Which leads to a question .... who did the Anointing?

Obviously God the Father .... consequently, if God and Christ were co-equal as per the Nicene Creed .... then Jesus Christ could not be described as the “Christ” since there would have been no reason for him to annoint himself.

Another take on this is if Christ was the “Anointed One” then it stands to reason that there were others who were not anointed.


51 posted on 01/08/2011 10:46:44 PM PST by teppe (... for my God ... for my Family ... for my Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN

The truth is that the name “Christ” is an anglisized version of the Greek “Christos” which is a translation of the Hebrew “Messiah” which meanes the “Anointed One”.

“Christ” means the “Anointed One”!

Which leads to a question .... who did the Anointing?

Obviously God the Father .... consequently, if God and Christ were co-equal as per the Nicene Creed .... then Jesus Christ could not be described as the “Christ” since there would have been no reason for him to annoint himself.

Another take on this is if Christ was the “Anointed One” then it stands to reason that there were others who were not anointed.


55 posted on 01/08/2011 10:50:50 PM PST by teppe (... for my God ... for my Family ... for my Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson