Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: rogue yam; Jim Robinson
Of course, but just because Jim or anyone else doesn't consider us Christians, denying self professing Christians a Caucus forum while allowing all others seems out of harmony with the spirit of the Forum.

I still think if it's a choice between getting rid of LDS Caucus threads and allowing and promoting anti Mormon threads, then do away with all Caucus threads completely.

241 posted on 01/02/2011 9:39:59 PM PST by Ripliancum (Let all bitterness, wrath, anger, clamour, and evil speaking, be put away from you. -Eph. 4:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: Ripliancum

Look, if you don’t like the way I choose to manage this site, you can always post elsewhere.


247 posted on 01/02/2011 9:42:21 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Nuke the corrupt commie bastards to HELL!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

To: Ripliancum
Of course, but just because Jim or anyone else doesn't consider us Christians, denying self professing Christians a Caucus forum while allowing all others seems out of harmony with the spirit of the Forum.

I still think if it's a choice between getting rid of LDS Caucus threads and allowing and promoting anti Mormon threads, then do away with all Caucus threads completely.

This is Jim's forum and I never offer him advice on how to run it.

That said, I don't think it is true that all self-described Christians have caucus threads here. For example I have never seen caucus threads for Christian Scientists, nor for Jehova's Witnesses.

I understand and expect Mormons to promote Mormonism and I see your call to eliminate all caucuses in the event that Mormon Caucus threads are disallowed as an example of that. However I don't see any reason why the "spirit of the Forum" would require this.

277 posted on 01/02/2011 10:15:26 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

To: Ripliancum; rogue yam; Jim Robinson

You make it sound like only Christian groups are allowed caucus designation, and that isn’t true. There are Jewish/Noahchide caucuses as well.

The problem is that the LDS ABUSE the caucus designation, posting articles that are designed to proselytize without any debate.


658 posted on 01/03/2011 11:22:28 AM PST by reaganaut (Ex Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

To: Ripliancum
 
Of course, but just because Jim or anyone else doesn't consider us Christians, denying self professing Christians a Caucus forum while allowing all others seems out of harmony with the spirit of the Forum.
 
HYPOCRITES usually cannot see themselves in a mirror.

 


Style Guide - The Name of the Church

The official name of the Church is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. This full name was given by revelation from God to Joseph Smith in 1838.

While the term "Mormon Church" has long been publicly applied to the Church as a nickname, it is not an authorized title, and the Church discourages its use.

When writing about the Church, please follow these guidelines:

  • In the first reference, the full name of the Church is preferred: "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints".
  • Please avoid the use of "Mormon Church", "LDS Church" or the "Church of the Latter-day Saints".
  • When a shortened reference is needed, the terms "the Church" or "the Church of Jesus Christ" are encouraged.
  • When referring to Church members, the term "Latter-day Saints" is preferred, though "Mormons" is acceptable.
  • "Mormon" is correctly used in proper names such as the Book of Mormon, Mormon Tabernacle Choir or Mormon Trail, or when used as an adjective in such expressions as "Mormon pioneers."
  • The term "Mormonism" is acceptable in describing the combination of doctrine, culture and lifestyle unique to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
  • When referring to people or organizations that practice polygamy, the terms "Mormons," "Mormon fundamentalist," "Mormon dissidents," etc. are incorrect. The Associated Press Stylebook notes: "The term Mormon is not properly applied to the other ... churches that resulted from the split after [Joseph] Smith's death."
 

http://beta-newsroom.lds.org/article/use-of-the-word-mormon-in-news-reports
 


 

 
Speaking of HYPOCRITES...
 

 New President Thomas S. Monson, is the highest ranking official in The Mormon Church.


Left Back Row: Elder Richard G. Scott (1988) * Elder Robert D. Hales (1994)  Elder Jeffrey R. Holland (1994) * President Henry B. Eyring (1995) Second Counselor, First Presidency since 2007  Elder Dieter F. Uchtdorf (2004) Newly called Second Counsel

WHY won't these LOVING and CARING men reach out to the people who actually follow MORMON scripture (D&C 132) and ALLOW them to be called MORMON?

 

Since the SLC hierarchy is afraid of the Government and NOT of GOD, THEY should be the ones who CANNOT be called MORMONs: NOT the FUNDAMENTALISTs!


799 posted on 01/03/2011 12:53:37 PM PST by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson