Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Because of the Protestant Reformers Beliefs On Mary
Why I Am a Catholic ^ | 12/16/10 | Frank Weathers

Posted on 12/17/2010 7:31:07 AM PST by marshmallow

Back when I first joined YIMCatholic, I was going to write posts about my conversion. I hammered out seven posts in pretty rapid succession and then, I stopped writing them until recently.

Many of my posts now are simply my observations of the world which are colored through the lens of a convert to Catholicism. It would be difficult for them not to be. Other posts I've written are of the "look what I just found!" variety, and the "I want to share this with you" type. Call them the discovery posts if you will.

Recently I gave a talk on the Communion of Saints for my parishes RCIA group. Consequently, I've been answering questions of potential converts that have prompted me to explain my conversion to others.

Basically, this has resulted in my having become a neophyte evangelist of sorts for the Church. And though this blog space isn't the forum for heavy-duty apologetics, because others do that better elsewhere, I have always seen my role here at YIMC as one of evangelizing.

Back to my conversion story, when I was first confronting the idea of becoming a Catholic, I had to look hard at the question "Why am I Protestant?" Having just moved cross-country following my retirement from the Marines, I found out that my mother no longer went to church where we had gone when I was growing up. Instead of the non-denominational church I grew up in (and which we were a founding family of), I learned that she now went to a Presbyterian church instead. Hmmm.

Rather than start visiting all kinds of churches, which appealed to me about as much as shopping for a new car, my family and I kept going to the local Catholic parish in our new town while I did research and home improvement projects. One of the first things I looked into was the problem of Catholics and their obviously misguided devotion to the Virgin Mary.

The funny thing is, I had sat in the pews in the Catholic Church with my wife for close to 18 years and I had never really noticed any wacky or overly zealous devotion to Mary. Not at Mass, anyway, and as we didn't stick around much after the conclusion of Mass, I didn't see anything that made me uncomfortable. Truthfully, I was surprised about this and it's probably a big reason why I continued to sit in the pews with my patient Catholic wife for that long a time.

This didn't stop me from believing that weird Marian devotions were happening though, and I assumed talk of her perpetual virginity was just "crazy talk." Like most, I had no idea what the Immaculate Conception was either and I just thought people were referring to Our Lord's conception. I was ignorant, plain and simple. But I had in mind a mission to correct the wrong religious track that my family was on so I started planning the military campaign to retake the spiritual territory I had ceded to the Church. My first target was what I thought would be the easiest: Mary.

Before I went on my "destroy Marian Devotion" offensive, though, I knew I would have to do a little homework. Planning ahead, you see, I figured the best place to start was with the guys who picked up the Protestant Reformation football and ran with it for touchdowns. Follow the winners Frank, and victory will be yours!

But get this. Much to my surprise, nay, shock(!) I had to throw a penalty flag on myself and look for a different angle of attack. Because what I found out was that the Big Three "Reformers" all agreed with the Catholic Church's teachings on the Mother of God!

Here is what I found, courtesy of the site catholicapologetics.info,

Martin Luther:

Mary the Mother of God

Throughout his life Luther maintained without change the historic Christian affirmation that Mary was the Mother of God:

"She is rightly called not only the mother of the man, but also the Mother of God ... It is certain that Mary is the Mother of the real and true God."

Perpetual Virginity

Again throughout his life Luther held that Mary's perpetual virginity was an article of faith for all Christians - and interpreted Galatians 4:4 to mean that Christ was "born of a woman" alone.

"It is an article of faith that Mary is Mother of the Lord and still a Virgin."

The Immaculate Conception

Yet again the Immaculate Conception was a doctrine Luther defended to his death (as confirmed by Lutheran scholars like Arthur Piepkorn). Like Augustine, Luther saw an unbreakable link between Mary's divine maternity, perpetual virginity and Immaculate Conception. Although his formulation of the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception was not clear-cut, he held that her soul was devoid of sin from the beginning:

"But the other conception, namely the infusion of the soul, it is piously and suitably believed, was without any sin, so that while the soul was being infused, she would at the same time be cleansed from original sin and adorned with the gifts of God to receive the holy soul thus infused. And thus, in the very moment in which she began to live, she was without all sin..."

Assumption

Although he did not make it an article of faith, Luther said of the doctrine of the Assumption:

"There can be no doubt that the Virgin Mary is in heaven. How it happened we do not know."

Honor to Mary

Despite his unremitting criticism of the traditional doctrines of Marian mediation and intercession, to the end Luther continued to proclaim that Mary should be honored. He made it a point to preach on her feast days.

"The veneration of Mary is inscribed in the very depths of the human heart."

"Is Christ only to be adored? Or is the holy Mother of God rather not to be honoured? This is the woman who crushed the Serpent's head. Hear us. For your Son denies you nothing." Luther made this statement in his last sermon at Wittenberg in January 1546.

John Calvin:

It has been said that John Calvin belonged to the second generation of the Reformers and certainly his theology of double predestination governed his views on Marian and all other Christian doctrine . Although Calvin was not as profuse in his praise of Mary as Martin Luther he did not deny her perpetual virginity. The term he used most commonly in referring to Mary was "Holy Virgin".

"Elizabeth called Mary Mother of the Lord, because the unity of the person in the two natures of Christ was such that she could have said that the mortal man engendered in the womb of Mary was at the same time the eternal God."

"Helvidius has shown himself too ignorant, in saying that Mary had several sons, because mention is made in some passages of the brothers of Christ." Calvin translated "brothers" in this context to mean cousins or relatives.

"It cannot be denied that God in choosing and destining Mary to be the Mother of his Son, granted her the highest honor."

"To this day we cannot enjoy the blessing brought to us in Christ without thinking at the same time of that which God gave as adornment and honour to Mary, in willing her to be the mother of his only-begotten Son."

Ulrich Zwingli:

"It was given to her what belongs to no creature, that in the flesh she should bring forth the Son of God."

"I firmly believe that Mary, according to the words of the gospel as a pure Virgin brought forth for us the Son of God and in childbirth and after childbirth forever remained a pure, intact Virgin." Zwingli used Exodus 4:22 to defend the doctrine of Mary's perpetual virginity.

"I esteem immensely the Mother of God, the ever chaste, immaculate Virgin Mary."

"Christ ... was born of a most undefiled Virgin."

"It was fitting that such a holy Son should have a holy Mother."

"The more the honor and love of Christ increases among men, so much the esteem and honor given to Mary should grow."

I remember being blown away by these revelations. I had gone to Christian churches my whole life and I had been told what I was supposed to believe, and I had never been told these things about Mary. I felt a little bit like the fellow wearing tan below, even though I was really acting like the guy wearing black.

And then I thought, "methinks they dost protest too much." And like young Skywalker above, I too leaped with faith and lived to tell the tale. I didn't land on my feet though. Instead, I landed in the lap of Blaise Pascal.

And so began the process of my going back to the Scriptures and to the Church Fathers and back through the history of the Catholic Church, and finally back into the arms of Christ's Church Herself.

Perhaps this post is a prequel in the 2BFrank saga. Sheeeesh!

To read more about the Protestant Reformers views on the Blessed Virgin Mary, and to track down the footnotes too, head on over to catholicapologetics.info. Head over to Scripture Catholic too, and bring your Bibles. Then head over to the Vatican and look at the Catechism of the Catholic Church as well.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Theology
KEYWORDS: freformed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,461-1,4801,481-1,5001,501-1,520 ... 1,541-1,558 next last
To: maryz

Funny. Neither do I. Please go learn about what you accuse me of falsely. I believe in the Triune God; Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. One God, three persons. As taught in the Scripture.

Chapter 8 of the Westminster Confession of Faith beautifully states the truth of Christ found in the Scripture. Article XIX of the Belgic Confession is nice also.

Hoss


1,481 posted on 12/21/2010 1:14:28 PM PST by HossB86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1477 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

Such a body then would not be the one we have now since it does decay and feel pain, etc.?
“It is sown a physical body, it is raised up a spiritual body”?


1,482 posted on 12/21/2010 1:14:28 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1471 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

Still a body, not just spirit.


1,483 posted on 12/21/2010 1:21:24 PM PST by BenKenobi (Rush speaks! I hear, I obey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1482 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

This thread is the equivalent of:

“Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet?
Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet?
Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet?

No matter how many times you tell them the mileage, they don’t have any conception of either time or distance, and the childish powers of intellect can’t comprehend anything other than “I want what I want when I want.”

You must be an awesome father to keep reasoning with the unreasonable.


1,484 posted on 12/21/2010 1:25:07 PM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1480 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law; presently no screen name
From Dictionary.com: co·e·qual    [koh-ee-kwuhl] Show IPA –adjective 1. equal with another or each other in rank, ability, extent, etc.: The two top students were coequal. –noun 2. a coequal person or thing. Origin: 1350–1400; ME. See co-, equal —Related forms co·e·qual·i·ty   [koh-i-kwol-i-tee] Show IPA , co·e·qual·ness, noun co·e·qual·ly, adverb Apparently NOT as you say. If "co-" doesn't mean equal, why is definition no. 1 shown above??? It apparently DOES mean equal. Try again? Hoss
1,485 posted on 12/21/2010 1:47:07 PM PST by HossB86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1480 | View Replies]

To: HossB86
Nestorianism separates Christ's human and divine natures, claiming that Mary is mother of his human nature only -- that sounds like what you believe. It was condemned by the Council of Ephesus in 431; in condemning Nestorianism, the council confirmed Mary as Theotokos (she who bears God), a title already long in use.

Briefly, from Wikipedia:

Since mainstream Christians understand Jesus Christ as both fully God and fully human, they call Mary Theotokos to affirm the fullness of God's incarnation. The Council of Ephesus decreed, in opposition to those who denied Mary the title Theotokos ("the one who gives birth to God") but called her Christotokos ("the one who gives birth to Christ"), that Mary is Theotokos because her son Jesus is one person who is both God and man, divine and human.

1,486 posted on 12/21/2010 1:47:21 PM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1481 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

A spiritual body, i.e., not flesh but spirit as are other heavenly dwellers, the angels. Indeed as Paul says, there are “heavenly bodies”.


1,487 posted on 12/21/2010 1:48:06 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1483 | View Replies]

To: HossB86

Sorry for the format...

Hoss


1,488 posted on 12/21/2010 1:52:53 PM PST by HossB86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1485 | View Replies]

To: maryz

Did you read what I said I believed? Jesus is fully God and fully man. I don’t believe, as Nestorians do, that there is some sort of disharmony or understandable separation. Jesus is The Word made flesh. I don’t understand it. I believe it. I don’t believe the Roman Catholic Church’s elevation of Mary beyond what is in Scripture.

Hoss


1,489 posted on 12/21/2010 2:07:08 PM PST by HossB86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1486 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
"You must be an awesome father to keep reasoning with the unreasonable."

On one level this is as frustrating as arguing the comparison of sunsets with the color blind. Some are truly evil in their obstinacy. But on the other level it is like dealing with retarded children. We have to remind ourselves that it is not their fault they are retarded and answer their questions within the uniqueness of the moment. They may not get it, but then again they just might and it would be a sin against them and Jesus to have thrown away that momentary opportunity.

I must more often say the prayer given us by Reinhold Niebuhr (yes, I know he was a Protestant):

God, grant us the...

Serenity to accept things we cannot change,

Courage to change the things we can, and the

Wisdom to know the difference

Patience for the things that take time

Appreciation for all that we have, and

Tolerance for those with different struggles

Freedom to live beyond the limitations of our past ways, the

Ability to feel your love for us and our love for each other and the

Strength to get up and try again even when we feel it is hopeless.

1,490 posted on 12/21/2010 2:09:25 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1484 | View Replies]

To: HossB86
Sorry Hoss, you are picking up only a bit of the conversation and that gives you a contextual problem. The only "co" statements have been with respect to an assertion that the statement that Mary is considered by some to be the "Co-redeemer" it is the Catholic position that she is in some way equal with Christ. I simply answered that in this context, the translation into English was flawed. It means only she participated with Jesus in our redemption.

Mary is not unique in the cooperation and participation on our redemption. St. Augustine described the doctrine that moves us to an ever more complete participation in our Redeemer's sacrifice which we celebrate in the Eucharist:

"This wholly redeemed city, the assembly and society of the saints, is offered to God as a universal sacrifice by the high priest who in the form of a slave went so far as to offer himself for us in his Passion, to make us the Body of so great a head.... Such is the sacrifice of Christians: "we who are many are one Body in Christ" The Church continues to reproduce this sacrifice in the sacrament of the altar so well-known to believers wherein it is evident to them that in what she offers she herself is offered."

1,491 posted on 12/21/2010 2:23:31 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1485 | View Replies]

To: HossB86

If you can’t say at least that Mary is the Mother of God Incarnate, well, you don’t. To say she’s merely the mother of Christ’s human nature is to assume a division.


1,492 posted on 12/21/2010 2:44:59 PM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1489 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

NIEBUHR’S PRAYER IS AN ABIDINGLY WONDERFUL, HEALTHY PRAYER.

THX.


1,493 posted on 12/21/2010 3:21:41 PM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1490 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law; Amityschild; Brad's Gramma; Captain Beyond; Cvengr; DvdMom; firebrand; ...

That rationalization doesn’t cut it.

“With” is about as heretical as “co-.”

So, Mary was an existential postal person for delivering Christ’s mortal personhood to this sphere.

Even if the postman brings a big check, we don’t usually carry him around on a throne therefrom.

Therefore?

Therefore she was THEREIN blessed.

Period.

Deed done. Job over.

Christ made abundantly clear that John the Baptist was a greater mortal than ALL born of women [logically save Christ, of course].

Further, that those obedient to The Father’s will were equally Christ’s blood relatives just as his mother, father, brothers and sisters were His blood relatives.

There is absolutely NO Biblical, nor historical nor logical justification for elevating Mary WHATSOEVER.

There’s a LOT of Biblical justification for doing absolutely NOTHING of the kind whatsoever.

I’ve posted the relevant Scriptures enough, I’ll not, this time.


1,494 posted on 12/21/2010 3:29:28 PM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1491 | View Replies]

To: HossB86

you said,

Jesus is fully God and fully man

I say,
AMEN


1,495 posted on 12/21/2010 3:32:02 PM PST by Joya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1489 | View Replies]

To: Quix
"So, Mary was an existential postal person for delivering Christ’s mortal personhood to this sphere."

I understand where you are coming from, but I obviously don't agree with it.

1,496 posted on 12/21/2010 3:43:18 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1494 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

” I simply answered that in this context, the translation into English was flawed. It means only she participated with Jesus in our redemption.”

Uh, no she didn’t. Did she hang on the cross? Did she shed her blood for the remission of our sins? Please, please, please, please, please cite scripture that ascribes to Mary ANY office or authority to participate with Christ in our redemption!!!!

“St. Augustine described the doctrine....”
Based on what scriptural reference(s)?

I can provide some that show that Christ alone is our redeemer and intercessor:
1 Tim. 2:5-7
“5For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, 6 who gave himself as a ransom for all, which is the testimony given at the proper time.”

Hmm. Nothing there about Mary.

Acts 4:11-12
“11 This Jesus is the stone that was rejected by you, the builders, which has become the cornerstone. 12And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”

How about from Jesus’ mouth directly — direct from God:
John 14:6
“6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.””

Mary didn’t participate in ANY way with Christ in order to secure our redemption or salvation. She bore him. She is in no way equal with him, working with him or providing any intercession for us. Sorry.

Hoss


1,497 posted on 12/21/2010 3:43:21 PM PST by HossB86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1491 | View Replies]

To: maryz; Amityschild; Brad's Gramma; Captain Beyond; Cvengr; DvdMom; firebrand; GiovannaNicoletta; ...
NOPE.

THAT'S FALSE.

. . . BEARING FALSE WITNESS, ACTUALLY.

Believing that Jesus is genuinely God Incarnate has little to nothing to do with the inappropriateness of calling Mary, the Mother of God.

Y'all are bright enough to know that

MOTHER OF GOD

carrys a long list of implications with it.

THAT'S THE ONLY LOGICAL REASON I CAN SEE THAT JUSTIFIES WHY Y'ALL DO IT! Y'ALL SEEM TO RELISH THOSE IMPLICATIONS AND THE CONTRARINESS THEY STAND FOR VIS A VIS THE REST OF CHRISTENDOM.

Y'ALL SEEM TO RELISH THE FACT THAT ALL AND SUNDRY GET INJECTED WITH SUCH IMPLICATIONS EVERY TIME THEY HEAR OR READ THAT MARY IS THE PURPORTED MOTHER OF GOD.

Y'ALL SEEM TO RELISH THE FACT THAT EVERY MENTION OF THAT ELEVATES MARY TO HER PURPORTED "HYPOSTATIC UNION WITH THE TRINITY."

Y'ALL SCARF UP ON THAT BIG TIME AND !!!!DEMAND!!!! THAT THE REST OF THE WORLD JOIN IN SUCH BLASPHEMOUS IDOLTRY.

Oh, SURE, when pinned down, y'all quickly retreat into the farcical noise about how it's techincally true because Jesus is God etc. etc. yada yada yada.

When actually, that has nothing to do with it. Y'all know full well what MOTHER OF GOD IMPLIES and you seem to love forcing it down the world's throat in contrary rebellion against Scripture vis a vis not elevating mortals to God-like status.

It's all the worse given such Scriptures as:

From:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2644744/posts?page=143#143

To: narses
ok, tried to look for NT translations from the original Greek. I did find the following from

http://www.greeknewtestament.com/index2.htm

(another ‘bigoted’ source):

Latin Vulgate 6:3 nonne iste est faber filius Mariae frater Iacobi et Ioseph et Iudae et Simonis nonne et sorores eius hic nobiscum sunt et scandalizabantur in illo

King James Version 6:3 Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him.

American Standard Version 6:3 Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, and brother of James, and Joses, and Judas, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended in him.

Bible in Basic English 6:3 Is not this the woodworker, the son of Mary, and brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were bitter against him.

Darby's English Translation 6:3 Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, and brother of James, and Joses, and Judas, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended in him.

Douay Rheims 6:3 Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joseph, and Jude, and Simon? are not also his sisters here with us? And they were scandalized in regard of him.

Noah Webster Bible 6:3 Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Judas, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him.

Weymouth New Testament 6:3 Is not this the carpenter, Mary's son, the brother of James and Joses, Jude and Simon? And do not his sisters live here among us?' So they turned angrily away.

World English Bible 6:3 Isn't this the carpenter, the son of Mary, and brother of James, Joses, Judas, and Simon? Aren't his sisters here with us?' They were offended by him.

Young's Literal Translation 6:3 Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, and brother of James, and Joses, and Judas, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us?' -- and they were being stumbled at him.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2644744/posts?page=25

“. . . a self-appointed leader of the church in the fifth century, this comes up at that time. There’s a discussion about Mary being assumed into heaven. So already this goddess cult has imposed itself on poor Mary. And it was at first considered heretical. There was no evidence for it historically, there’s no evidence for it biblically, obviously. So the earliest appearance of this idea is in a very apocryphal work, an unreliable work like the gospel of Judas and hundreds of others. It was called Transitus Getti Marii (???) and it was in the fifth century it was denounced as a heresy. So when it first showed up in the fifth century, the 400′s, it is denounced as a heresy. But things began to develop over the years in regard to Mary. Praying to Mary arrives in 600…

‘Mother of God’

MacArthur traces the origins of this title to Alexander, the 4th century Bishop of Alexandria:

Goddess worship, the very outset, the Holy Roman Empire comes into existence in the fourth century, early in the century. This mother of God comes in rapidly by the year 431 and the Council of Ephesus and 451, The Council of Chalcedon, this is established. She is to be called the mother of God, this contributes to centuries and centuries and centuries of accumulated deification of Mary. She becomes equal to God. And though the Church tries its best to wiggle out of this, it tries its best to deny this, the truth of the matter is, she really is superior to God and superior to Christ as becomes very evident in what they say and in how they portray her in cathedrals all over the world. She rules in heaven as queen, sovereign, saving, sanctifying, sympathizing, all this power is given to her that belongs only to God.

A book in 1993 had about a thousand appearances of Mary that were documented thirty times in the eighteenth century, 200 times in the nineteenth century and 450 times in the twentieth century. So they are escalating at a rapid rate. Cardinal Meisner claims that Mary brought Christ to Europe from Fatima and one would ask where was he before that if she brought him? She visited a farm in Georgia, an office building in Clearwater, Florida, and a subway wall recently in Mexico City. She comes so often and she comes to the down and out and she comes to the little children, she comes to the peasant people and this validates the fact that she is this loving, sympathetic, merciful, tender-hearted compassionate person … The only person if there is someone really appearing to them is right out of hell. This is demonic, for sure….for sure. But what assurances and what cleverness the demons offer for the deceived and the damned with their hellish counterfeits.

The point is, you go to Mary because Jesus can’t resist Mary. And Mary, because she’s so merciful, can’t resist you. Mary, claims the Church, can persuade God to grant what He otherwise wouldn’t grant …

You’re really banging on steel if you go to God yourself. Go to Mary and He listens to Mary …

You see, Roman Catholicism is pagan goddess worship, completely distracted. God is reinvented as judgmental, harsh. Christ is reinvented as indifferent. Everybody worships Mary …

John Paul II MacArthur tells us of the importance that Mary played in the late pope’s life from his childhood through to his papacy. He reads the congregation excerpts from some of John Paul II’s Marian thoughts and says:

Now that…that’s a pretty bold statement. She is not only the mediatrix of all grace, the channel through which all grace comes, the one to whom we go for everything, but she is even involved in our redemption …

That of those

born of a woman

JOHN THE BAPTIST

WAS THE GREATEST ON EARTH.

I tell you THE TRUTH: Among those born of women there has not risen anyone greater than John the Baptist; yet he who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.

Jesus’ Mother and Brothers
46While he was still speaking to the people, behold,(BR) his mother and his(BS) brothers stood outside, asking to speak to him.[a] 48But he replied to the man who told him, "Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?" 49And stretching out his hand toward his disciples, he said, "Here are my mother and my brothers! 50For(BT) whoever(BU) does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother." ESV

Obedience Is Thicker than Blood 46-47While he was still talking to the crowd, his mother and brothers showed up. They were outside trying to get a message to him. Someone told Jesus, "Your mother and brothers are out here, wanting to speak with you." 48-50Jesus didn't respond directly, but said, "Who do you think my mother and brothers are?" He then stretched out his hand toward his disciples. "Look closely. These are my mother and brothers. Obedience is thicker than blood. The person who obeys my heavenly Father's will is my brother and sister and mother." THE MESSAGE

The True Family of Jesus 46 As Jesus was speaking to the crowd, his mother and brothers stood outside, asking to speak to him. 47 Someone told Jesus, “Your mother and your brothers are outside, and they want to speak to you.”[g] 48 Jesus asked, “Who is my mother? Who are my brothers?” 49 Then he pointed to his disciples and said, “Look, these are my mother and brothers. 50 Anyone who does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother!”--NEW LIVING TRANSLATION

.

. . . obviously, other than Christ Himself . . .

I guess y'all think Mary was hatched under a sacred rock--in Rome?

OR DO YOU SIMPLY REFUSE TO BELIEVE

GOD'S WORD?

1,498 posted on 12/21/2010 3:51:03 PM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1472 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

The Biblical record supports nothing to little more, imho.


1,499 posted on 12/21/2010 3:52:16 PM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1496 | View Replies]

To: maryz

After doing a search (which may not be totally complete), I can only find where others are telling me I said what you’re saying.

Sorry. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: Jesus is fully God and Fully Man. I’ve been accused of being a Nestorian (falsely in fact); Jesus, the Second Person of the Godhead existed always with the Father and the Holy Spirit.

Mary bore Jesus. She’s not the Queen of Heaven, she’s not a co-redemptrix, co-mediatrix, or co- anything.

Sorry. Just the way it is.

Hoss


1,500 posted on 12/21/2010 3:53:06 PM PST by HossB86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1492 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,461-1,4801,481-1,5001,501-1,520 ... 1,541-1,558 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson