Your arguments are at odds with each other. First you say that the book of mormon isn’t what it claims to be because you can’t find any artifacts or archeological sites to back it up. Then you say that there is no evidence that god is, so you just have to believe and that’s ok. So which is it?
Either god reveals truth to his children or he doesn’t. It wouldn’t have occurred to me that he depended on archeologists to really drive his point home.
I'm sorry I was misunderstood.
I meant that IF it were what it claimed to be; then there SHOULD be artifacts in abundance - with all other things being equal.
Why isn't there?
WHY hasn't MORMONism dug up the Hill all over the place?
After all; that is JS' legacy: digging in the dirt looking for treasure.