Yeah, the point is, if you want people to read something for “discernment” it would be wise to choose an article that isn’t full of errors and outright distortions.
Michael O’Brien has an agenda; he is selling books that say Harry Potter is evil. And if those quotes in the article came from him, he didn’t bother actually reading the books, but pulled a couple things out of context, took information off the internet, and accepted nutty anonymous sources.