“I do not now nor have I `never offered rebuttal for such an interpretation or point of view expressed by Catholics in the Religion forum. I understand where it comes from and do not condemn it.”
Yeah, but the problem is, delacoert, I don't think that any Catholic I know, nor any in this forum, think that ANYONE is “lying” because he disagrees with Catholic teaching.
We think you're in ERROR. We think you're MISGUIDED. We think that you're IN DANGER OF GOING TO HELL.
But just for the offense of saying something that doesn't agree with Catholic teaching, we don't think you're lying.
We may say it's a lie if someone misrepresents what we believe, even after having been corrected numerous times.
But it's not a lie if you don't believe in Transubstantiation. Or the Immaculate Conception of Mary. Or the Trinity, for that matter (there are posters here on FR who consider themselves Christians who do not believe in the Trinity).
We think you're WRONG if you don't believe these things.
But not a liar telling lies.
“No.` I chose a provocative phrase to counter what I perceive as a provocative position as you have chosen to express it.”
I'm trying to show you the mirror of your view about the LDS as we Catholics might express it toward YOU, if we were to adopt a parallel view. In doing this, I'm not saying that we Catholics should think that non-Catholics/non-Orthodox are liars because they don't accept all our teachings or believe things that contradict our teachings. In fact, what I'm trying to do is to point out the ILLEGITIMACY of such a perspective.
No non-Catholic/non-Orthodox Christian is telling LIES (except, if one qualifies those lies as lies of Satan, or Luther, or Calvin, or Zwingli, or some other figure who further split off from the Church and from the sects that split off from the Church), nor is he a liar merely for professing his religious belief.
sitetest
Yeah; we know...
I consider myself to be People magazine's Sexiest Man of the Year for 2011, too.