[Natural Law]

"The mod has already passed judgment on NL’s comments. There’s nothing that needs to be added to them."

What a contradiction you are. You deny the very concept of Papal infallibility but staunchly defend Mod infallibility without even knowing that the mod and I have discussed the objectionable term and concluded it really wasn't objectionable. Then in the wake of that you dredge the issue up again to signify that the mods work was insufficient punishment. Who do you believe the final judge should be on this if not the mod? You? The harpie coven?

[metmom]

You deny the very concept of Papal infallibility but staunchly defend Mod infallibility without even knowing that the mod and I have discussed the objectionable term and concluded it really wasn't objectionable.

I defend mod infallibility? I think they're infallible? You know that for a fact, do ya?

How?