To: bkaycee
Mary's cloak is in Aachen Germany. Does that now disprove the assumption? If there is only a second class relic and no first class relic (bones), that further supports the argument for assumption.
To: mas cerveza por favor; bkaycee
Mary's cloak is in Aachen Germany. Does that now disprove the assumption?
If there is only a second class relic and no first class relic (bones), that further supports the argument for assumption. And the multiple sets of Peter's bones proves what?
2,450 posted on
11/17/2010 4:13:49 PM PST by
OLD REGGIE
(I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
To: mas cerveza por favor; bkaycee
If there is only a second class relic and no first class relic (bones), that further supports the argument for assumption. Jimmy Hoffa's bones have never been found. Are we to assume a bodily assumption?
2,452 posted on
11/17/2010 4:16:30 PM PST by
OLD REGGIE
(I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson