[smvoice]

I’ve found something that is going to blow your mind. We discussed it a few months ago as conjecture, and decided it was wise not to give the RCC any ideas. Well, it seems they’ve had this idea and have been teaching it for a long while. Although it isn’t known to those outside the Church, and maybe not to some inside the Church. But it is guaranteed to make you sit up and say WT.. As soon as I can get an RC to tell us honestly if it is true, I will post it. I’ve always thougt annalex was the most honest and open about RCC teaching/beliefs. But he still hasn’t gotten back to me with this question of the RCC teaching that Mary’s spouse is the Holy Spirit. I’m still waiting for an answer from him about that.

[Quix]

That should be interesting alright.

Perhaps someone could then tell us . . . just who did Holy Spirit apply to for a special INDULGENCE to serve as one of Mary’s 2 hubbys?

Or maybe the contention will be that

Mary doesn’t have 2 hubbys per the Catechism

only

per the beliefs of a huge percentage of the leadership and the sheeple . . . applauded by the hierarchy . . .

yet another of those . . . WE BELIEVE IT EXCEPT WHEN WE DON’T . . . i.e. except when it’s inconvenient when arguing with Proddys.

[metmom]

Quite an absurd conjecture, totally not supported by Scripture in any way, which is just SOP for the RCC.

But that won’t stop them.

I honestly don’t recall specifically hearing that as a Catholic. I’m not sure if any others raised Catholic remember that either.

[annalex]

it isn’t known to those outside the Church, and maybe not to some inside the Church. But it is guaranteed to make you sit up and say WT..

Your excitement over that "discovery" is a good illustration of Protestant bumper sticker method. Yeah, I did answer, -- let me know if you have questions.