Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DesertRhino

The Early Church Fathers are almost unanimous in the assertion that the birth was painless and had no loss of Mary’s virginal integrity during the birth. In other words, her Hymen didn’t break. St. Augustine said “Jesus passed through the womb of Mary as a ray of sun passes through glass.” Pope Martin in 649 AD defined the doctrine that Mary:
The early Church Fathers argues a lot of very absurd things.This ranks with how many angels can fit on the head of a pin. It has nothing to do with anything . Many of these early Church Fathers lost themselves in matters and arguements that took them into areas that had nothing to do with the spiritual nature of things.


281 posted on 10/09/2010 6:31:56 AM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: sonic109
"The early Church Fathers argues a lot of very absurd things.This ranks with how many angels can fit on the head of a pin."

And the more proficient dancers got to wear robes, if not, they became really good used car salesmen or politicians. LOL.

283 posted on 10/09/2010 6:40:25 AM PDT by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

To: sonic109

Good point.

“ALMOST UNANIMOUS”

. . . the early ‘fathers’ were all over the water front on many things—like the RCC has been it’s 1600 years of existence.


302 posted on 10/09/2010 8:30:21 AM PDT by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

To: sonic109

The Early Church Fathers were all men who had no idea what childbirth was like...


318 posted on 10/09/2010 8:48:40 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

To: sonic109
I really doubt that anybody "Defined" anything about the gory (or not) details of the parturition of our Lord. I think this article is a little too breathless to be taken absolutely seriously. Had Paul VI 'defined' the quality of the divine parturition, it would have made headlines. I'll bet a box of the finest donuts that he expressed and opinion to which Catholics have the duty to pay attention, but not necessarily to give assent.

The question about angels on the head of a pin is NOT ridiculous. This is a canard by post Scholastics. It is not a question of angelology but of geometry and infinitessimals. Scholastics had a wit too, y'know. One of Satan's triumphs is to have used academia and the culture to lead everyone to think that they just know, without looking into it, that all Scholastics were dry as dust, joyless, wizened old men arguing in cumbersome vocabularies about microscopic points of abstract logic. The idea that Aquinas could crack jokes about his own not inconsiderable size just escapes their awareness because it does not fit with the prejudice.

The question, posed without scholastic wit, is "How many points are there in even the smallest conceivable area?"

The answer is left as an exercise for the reader.

320 posted on 10/09/2010 8:52:51 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson