Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: vladimir998; RnMomof7; metmom; 1000 silverlings; OLD REGGIE; Quix; Gamecock; Alex Murphy; ...
The other inquisitions were all run either by local bishops

"Local bishops" who were not under the papal rule?

Yeah, right. lol. Just like today, huh?

A veritable Italian free-for-all.

“And you say you want to introduce America to these Inquisitions.”

I wouldn’t mind.

Et tu, Brute?

Pathetic.

And some wonder why we should be worried about a Supreme Court dominated by Roman Catholics.

86 posted on 09/20/2010 10:20:43 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Eckleburg

You wrote:

“”Local bishops” who were not under the papal rule?”

The diocese was led by the bishop. The diocese was not led by teh Bishop of Rome.

“Yeah, right. lol. Just like today, huh?”

Again, a local bishop leads a diocese.

“A veritable Italian free-for-all.”

Neither France nor Spain are in Italy. Then again you apparently thought Rome was elsewhere than it is so why am I not surprised that you are confused.

“Pathetic.”

No, actually it would be a good thing.

“And some wonder why we should be worried about a Supreme Court dominated by Roman Catholics.”

No, I don’t wonder why the paranoid worry about anything.


160 posted on 09/21/2010 11:15:25 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Part of the Vast Catholic Conspiracy (hat tip to Kells))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson