To: Religion Moderator; Cronos
Ok, so if one says to roamer - "that statement is false. You're good, but the statement is a lie repeated. Can the statement prove that it is not a lie by using verifiable sources and not Oks from folks on this forum" -- is that ok?
The proposed statement makes no sense to me.
And I thought I was alone in attempting to make sense of the line of questioning.
873 posted on
09/01/2010 10:21:38 AM PDT by
OLD REGGIE
(I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
To: OLD REGGIE
To: OLD REGGIE; Religion Moderator
well, it goes in line with the RM’s statement that one can criticise the statement, not the one making the statement, which akin to saying “The statement was a lie! But the person saying it is not a liar”
877 posted on
09/01/2010 10:51:50 AM PDT by
Cronos
(Omnia mutantur, nihil interit. "Allah": Satan's current status)
To: OLD REGGIE; Religion Moderator
And of course it's like those who attack the Christian faith for a doctrine while not holding the most basic of all Christian doctrines, like the Trinity. Very imcomprehensible....
What do you Unitarians believe in, Old REg? That Jesus was not God, just a Good man?
878 posted on
09/01/2010 10:53:59 AM PDT by
Cronos
(Omnia mutantur, nihil interit. "Allah": Satan's current status)
To: OLD REGGIE
895 posted on
09/01/2010 12:16:39 PM PDT by
Quix
(C THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson