Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr

Good grief, the final insult from the RC apologist — you don’t understand RC belief.

Yes, many of us DO understand. It’s not that difficult. It’s pretty basic, in fact, when you go back and read the source materials like the RCC catechism and New Advent and Roman Catholic Caucus threads, etc.

It becomes painfully clear. “Another Christ” is “another Christ.” A re-sacrifice” is a “re-sacrifice.” A “co-redeemer” is a “co-redeemer.” “Another mediator” is “another mediator.”

We get it. Scripture denies it.


5,790 posted on 09/16/2010 11:45:16 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5787 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Eckleburg

Your posts do not indicate that you get it. They seem more determined than ever not to get it.

I cannot argue for a belief I do not hold.

I’ve watched folks labor to give you the correct vocabulary and doctrine, where it is clear, where it is more open to each believer - long posts that show precisely why your presentation of Catholic beliefs are incorrect. To no effect.

And the effort to get to a point of honest, yet passionate, debate on what Catholics believe has over and over again been futile.

The only thing I’m left with is getting your beliefs correct and arguing against them. If I have them wrong, please let me know.

But unless there is the corollary with my beliefs, it’s just, well, useless to try to defend and argue them.


5,797 posted on 09/17/2010 12:08:43 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5790 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson