Certainly he does. Read the thread you're referencing (in opposition to the rules of FR which says not to carry one argument over to another thread.)
Rome is not "silent" on infant salvation. Rome screams evil by its concocted fabrication of "limbo" being the eternal destiny of babies who are not baptized.
A satanic, completely unScriptural doctrine developed to frighten the masses into entering a church led by "another Christ."
That is not Christianity. That is coercion by evil.
Dr E:Certainly he does
Calivn says very explicitly that there are babies in hell.
"As regards children who have died without baptism, the Church can only entrust them to the mercy of God, as she does in her funeral rites for them. Indeed, the great mercy of God who desires that all men should be saved and Jesus tenderness toward children, which caused him to say, Let the children come to me, do not hinder them, allow us to hope that there is a way of salvation for children who have died without baptism. All the more urgent is the Churchs call not to prevent little children coming to Christ through the gift of holy baptism" (CCC 1261).What does Calvin say? He says that those unborn, unbaptised "elect" babies go to heaven. Does this mean that those killed in abortions are all, according to Calvin, "elect"? Does Calvinism them logically say that it should be wiser to "kill 'em all" since that would make them elect and go straight to heaven?