To: OLD REGGIE; Amityschild; Brad's Gramma; Captain Beyond; Cvengr; DvdMom; firebrand; ...
IF I feel up to it, I hope to highlight the blasphemous, idolatrous, heretical and fantasy parts of the first 50 paragraphs and intro of that document from:
http://www.ewtn.com/library/montfort/truedevo.htm
They look about as dreadful as the Ferraro book.
2,050 posted on
09/07/2010 5:54:56 PM PDT by
Quix
(C Bosses plans: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
To: Quix
That made me want to throw up...allot! How dare they!!!! Words simply do not exist that can explain such writings...and catholics really believe this garbage? It is so difficult to imagine possible.
2,055 posted on
09/07/2010 6:04:13 PM PDT by
caww
To: Quix
The gift of tongues was the gift to speak a known language for use in transmitting the gospel message to persons who spoke that particular language. In all cases when it was used, it was required that a translator be present and that only one person could use the gift at one time. Tongues were never used in the New Testament as a confirmation to believers, but as a confirmation to unbelievers of the reality of what they were being told. The apostle Paul considered the gift of tongues to be the least of the gifts, but charismatic believers fervently seek after it and place it at the top as the most favored and desirable. By turning the value of the gift upside down, they show that the gift is sought, not because of its spiritual value, but because of its display and exhibitionist qualities, and the subsequent claims to spirituality and prestige that are made when a person demonstrates what is said to be the gift.
2,107 posted on
09/07/2010 11:21:50 PM PDT by
Cronos
(Omnia mutantur, nihil interit. "Allah": Satan's current status)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson