[RnMomof7]

You have beaten that horse to death. Show me the scripture that says that Scripture alone is to be the only

So evidently there is no biblical president for a NT church priesthood.. so the claim that the Roman church is the church founded by God in the NT is obviously false..

Crying "uncle" is always tough huh?

[Natural Law]

"So evidently there is no biblical president for a NT church priesthood.."

Again, you twist the original point so as not to have to actually answer the difficult question. I asked a very specific question; Where in Scripture does it say that 100% of the Revealed Word is contained in Scripture?

As for where in Scripture the precedent (not president) is found for a New Testament priesthood read 2 Peter.

[Jaded]

I suppose the president would be Christ?

[Mad Dawg]

So evidently there is no biblical president for a NT church priesthood.. so the claim that the Roman church is the church founded by God in the NT is obviously false..

What? That makes no sense that I can see, neither half.

They want to use the scriptures when it suites their purposes.. other wise it gathers dust..

They want to use the scriptures reason when it suites their purposes.. other wise it gathers drust..

I guess it's easier to refute something we do not teach. You have not given a plausible account of our theology of orders, and your offered refutations do not refute what we teach.

[count-your-change]

Again since I pinged.....

As we have established the NT priesthood was Christ, (Heb. 4:14, 9:24), acting as high priest and the under priests being those resurrected to heaven to serve in that capacity, (1 Peter 2:9, Rev. 5:9) there exists no priestly class or service within the framework of the Christian congregation, no “Fathers” (Matt. 23:9).