ABSURD
HILLARIOUS
(YET PATHETIC)
JURY-RIGGED
STRETCHY REALITY
RIDICULOUS
!FARCE!
OF AN
ASSERTION!
Posted on 08/27/2010 11:45:13 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
Don’t most hosting sites only allow hotlinking for folks with paid subscriptions?
Ahhhh welll
off to church . . .
of course, the rabid clique types plus a lot of the regular RC’s just think I’m off,
period.
LOL.
INDEED.
INDEED. VERY WELL PUT.
THX.
THX THX.
OLD REGGIE and Natural Law, DO NOT accuse another Freeper of telling lies. That attributes motive, the intent to deceive. It is "making it personal."
Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.
I agree,dear friend,and pray for many here during Adoration often.
That said, we cannot enable them to spew either without response sometime
I wish you a Blessed evening!
Excuse me, but you are going to have to point out to me where I accused anyone in specific of lying. I have been extremely careful not to bait or feed trolls or use any "y" words.
I did however assert that there are indeed liars who frequent this site. Is that in dispute?
Do not make it personal.
All the animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.
The two posts are not equivalent. One actually IS a veiled remark. It's not much different than, "All Catholics who accept that Mary was assumed into Heaven are idolaters," and posting it to a crowd of Catholics who have just finished explaining the reasonableness of the dogma of the Assumption. It is more veiled, less explicit than any of the psychotically-formatted (and likely demonically-infested) "rabid clique" posts.
The other is not veiled at all. Through the use of an image, it calls specific posters liars.
To equate them is evidence of bias.
sitetest
You are in no position to judge me. I have the rap sheets. You don’t.
All the animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.
INDEED!
Clearly the RC’S ARE GREATLY MORE EQUAL than Proddys hereon and always have been.
RABID CLIQUES OF RC’S
more or less get away with extremely thinly veiled accusations—calling clearly specified Proddys “LIARS” virtually day in and day out if not 100% literally day in and day out. Every regular poster hereon could likely “guess” specifically who the two main targets are and be 99.99% to 100% accurate 100% of the time.
Yet the RC’s get called down on it probably once or twice a week to once or twice in 3 weeks.
So, yeah, the RC’s are soooooooooooooooooooooooooo disadvantaged. /sarc to the max.
That any of you would assert so in the face of piles of evidence to the opposite is an outrageously vivid declaration and demonstration of the gross lack of insight and poor reality testing so chronic amongst the rabid cliques under the RC umbrella.
Proddys don’t even accuse anyone of such a thing very often at all. Even when we have an epidemic of such we still only tend to do it 3-5 times a month, on average. And MANY months will go by when none of us do it at all.
And, we are much more skillful and rule abiding in that we put our accusations much more genuinely in truly broader general terms.
Yet we get called down on it as often as the RC’s do. Go figure.
I think most Proddys can even appreciate the bind the RM must be in wanting genuinely to be fair as well as to genuinely APPEAR to be fair to all sides. It’s just that many times, THAT need, goal, strategy, whatever, seems to disadvantage Proddys rather excessively on some points and issues—particularly when such as the LIAR LIAR accusation stuff is REALLY NOT THAT OFTEN A THING that Proddys are remotely guilty of
WHILE IT IS A DAILY THING by the RC’s against the Proddys.
Also, the facts, to me are horrifically starkly different on the two sides.
I know there was some indicent—maybe he would claim more than one incident where in Mad Dawg was accusing Dr E of brazenly lying. I read through the accusations and perspectives of both sides publicly and privately and still BELIEVED IT WAS A CASE OF REASONABLE PEOPLE COULD DIFFER ON THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF WHAT THE FACTS TRULY WERE.
And that was the WORST accusation I can ever recall against a Proddy hereon about lying.
However, I’ve seen Dr E accused of lying routinely. Hardly a day goes by that she is not accused of lying. Yet, when she documents that THE ACCUSER IS ACTUALLY THE ONE LYING—the whole thing skates by.
The recent business of her buying the encylcical and being told she was lying about that is just a recent outrageous case of such. There was no apology at all—just more bluster and outrageous accusation stuff.
The bulk of the rabid clique sorts of RC posters hereon are deepening my appreciation of the horrific dreadfulness of their perspective, their “spirituality,” their dogma, their idolatries, their blasphemies and their characters as well as of the whole Vatican structure that seems to breed such attitudes so liberally and frequently.
If I knew any of them were leaders in any congregation, I’d work very hard to avoid the congregation if it were the last one on earth.
I’m personally persisting in decreasing a lot of my rants about such things. I’m adding rabid clique members who I’m putting on more or less permenant virtually 100% ignore. their attitudes and demonstrations of their “Christianity” are not worthy my responses and I’m just a snotty nosed poor white trash version of a Christian.
Nevertheless, I believe every Proddy on here, including Dr E, really cares for every other FREEPER of any and every persuasion. We would rather that all individuals have a vibrant, genuine, growthful, redemptive, overcoming relationship with Jesus first and foremost.
THAT is one of the reasons we are so fiercely forceful about truths and principles we are convinced are Biblical vs those which we find hostile to true Biblical Christianity. By God’s grace we shall go on being so.
Yes, we will forcefully tell it as we see it. God expects that of us. It is in the Biblical and New Testament pattern.
There’s plenty more to say. However, I’ll stop here.
Quix said, and I highlight:
‘...I’m just a snotty nosed poor white trash version of a Christian.
‘Nevertheless, I believe every Proddy on here, including Dr E, really cares for every other FREEPER of any and every persuasion. We would rather that all individuals have a vibrant, genuine, growthful, redemptive, overcoming relationship with Jesus first and foremost.
‘THAT is one of the reasons we are so fiercely forceful about truths and principles we are convinced are Biblical vs those which we find hostile to true Biblical Christianity. By God’s grace we shall go on being so.
‘Yes, we will forcefully tell it as we see it. God expects that of us. It is in the Biblical and New Testament pattern.’
= = =
Thank you FRiend. Your calibre of genuine Christianity is top notch, not snotty nosed po’ white trash.
For $7 (over-priced at half the cost)...
Rev 3:14 And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;
15 I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.
16 So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.
17 Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked:
18 I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see.
19 As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_titular_sees_%28L-M%29
This post always cracks me up because what is really hilarious is the spelling, especially since it is used to ridicule the post of another.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.