Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intended Catholic Dictatorship
Independent Individualist ^ | 8/27/10 | Reginald Firehammer

Posted on 08/27/2010 11:45:13 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief

Intended Catholic Dictatorship

The ultimate intention of Catholicism is the restoration of the Holy Roman Empire. That has always been the ambition, at least covertly, but now it is being promoted overtly and openly.

The purpose of this article is only to make that intention clear. It is not a criticism of Catholics or Catholicism (unless you happen to think a Catholic dictatorship is not a good thing).

The most important point is to understand that when a Catholic talks about liberty or freedom, it is not individual liberty that is meant, not the freedom to live one's life as a responsible individual with the freedom to believe as one chooses, not the freedom to pursue happiness, not the freedom to produce and keep what one has produced as their property. What Catholicism means by freedom, is freedom to be a Catholic, in obedience to the dictates of Rome.

The Intentions Made Plain

The following is from the book Revolution and Counter-Revolution:

"B. Catholic Culture and Civilization

"Therefore, the ideal of the Counter-Revolution is to restore and promote Catholic culture and civilization. This theme would not be sufficiently enunciated if it did not contain a definition of what we understand by Catholic culture and Catholic civilization. We realize that the terms civilization and culture are used in many different senses. Obviously, it is not our intention here to take a position on a question of terminology. We limit ourselves to using these words as relatively precise labels to indicate certain realities. We are more concerned with providing a sound idea of these realities than with debating terminology.

"A soul in the state of grace possesses all virtues to a greater or lesser degree. Illuminated by faith, it has the elements to form the only true vision of the universe.

"The fundamental element of Catholic culture is the vision of the universe elaborated according to the doctrine of the Church. This culture includes not only the learning, that is, the possession of the information needed for such an elaboration, but also the analysis and coordination of this information according to Catholic doctrine. This culture is not restricted to the theological, philosophical, or scientific field, but encompasses the breadth of human knowledge; it is reflected in the arts and implies the affirmation of values that permeate all aspects of life.

"Catholic civilization is the structuring of all human relations, of all human institutions, and of the State itself according to the doctrine of the Church.

Got that? "Catholic civilization is the structuring of all human relations, of all human institutions, and of the State itself according to the doctrine of the Church." The other name for this is called "totalitarianism," the complete rule of every aspect of life.

This book and WEB sites like that where it is found are spreading like wildfire. These people do not believe the hope of America is the restoration of the liberties the founders sought to guarantee, these people believe the only hope for America is Fatima. Really!

In Their Own Words

The following is from the site, "RealCatholicTV." It is a plain call for a "benevolent dictatorship, a Catholic monarch;" their own words. They even suggest that when the "Lord's Payer," is recited, it is just such a Catholic dictatorship that is being prayed for.

[View video in original here or on Youtube. Will not show in FR.]

Two Comments

First, in this country, freedom of speech means that anyone may express any view no matter how much anyone else disagrees with that view, or is offended by it. I totally defend that meaning of freedom of speech.

This is what Catholics believe, and quite frankly, I do not see how any consistent Catholic could disagree with it, though I suspect some may. I have no objection to their promoting those views, because it is what they believe. Quite frankly I am delighted they are expressing them openly. For one thing, it makes it much easier to understand Catholic dialog, and what they mean by the words they use.

Secondly, I think if their views were actually implemented, it would mean the end true freedom, of course, but I do not believe there is any such danger.

—Reginald Firehammer (06/28/10)


TOPICS: Activism; Catholic; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: individualliberty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 4,181-4,2004,201-4,2204,221-4,240 ... 15,821-15,828 next last
To: Legatus
Excellent post.

When I (less than an hour ago) realized the fullness of the relationship that must exist when the former is joined to the latter it was quite possibly the closest thing to an epiphany I've ever experienced.

Same here. Thanks very much.

4,201 posted on 09/13/2010 9:51:24 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4119 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

AHHHH . . .

THX.


4,202 posted on 09/13/2010 9:53:56 AM PDT by Quix (PAPAL AGENT DESIGNEE: Resident Filth of non-Roman Catholics; RC AGENT DESIGNATED: "INSANE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4198 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; bkaycee; OLD REGGIE
You never answered that — according to you, are Unitarians (deniers of the Trinity), Protestants?

This happens when I have to go out of town.

I don't believe Unitarians are Reformation Evangelicals because I don't believe they were ever a part of the church you are a member of. Baptists are Evangelical, but were never involved in breaking away from your church so we wouldn't fit in that category either.

I'm not as well versed on Unitarians as I would like and it never occurred to me to question Old REGGIE'S sincerity.

Why is it RC's what to be such control freaks and try to control the language?

4,203 posted on 09/13/2010 10:04:21 AM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3740 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

Why is it RC’s what to be such control freaks and try to control the language?


Because . . .

!!!!CONTROL!!!! freaque stuff has been found to be a part of the Jezebel spirit . . . which was obviously in on the founding of THE SYSTEM in 300-400 AD.

When the foundation is built largely on that mentality from the beginning . . .

Alas, lots of Proddy congregations are afflicted with it too.

Purportedly my own as well . . . though it sure hides well. This is one of the least !!!!CONTROL!!!! freaquish congregations I’ve ever been a part of. It’s just that a very reliable prophetic woman I know insists it’s there and causing trouble. And I seem some evidence of it.


4,204 posted on 09/13/2010 10:09:22 AM PDT by Quix (PAPAL AGENT DESIGNEE: Resident Filth of non-Roman Catholics; RC AGENT DESIGNATED: "INSANE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4203 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg; metmom
The fact is, especially by your standards, that the vast majority of Catholics throughout the world are and always have been "poorly catechized".

Yep!

I think there's a danger of slipping into a contention: If enough people are poorly catechized, no one is poorly catechized. What's wrong with this proposition: If everybody has a bad education, then nobody has a bad education.

This loses me. I agree most ex-Catholics were poorly catechized, but only because most Catholics are poorly catechized. I believe the insinuation "you would still be Catholic if it were not the fact you were so poorly catechized" is without merit. It would be equally in error to say "all poorly catechized Catholics are necessarily now ex-Catholic." (This comment is not directed toward you, but to the many Catholics who dismiss the reasoning of ex-Catholics by their simplistic "poor catechis" reasoning.)

I can see a parish singing the Pange Lingua only once a year, on Holy Thursday. But even in small Scottsville VA they have Benediction at least monthly. A couple of years of that and the people will know the Tantum Ergo. If they don't trouble to figure out what it means when it says, "Let faith stand in for the deficiency of the senses," then, well, they ought to keep silent about transubstantiation.

Many learn the words, or rather, the sound of the words by rote and don't spend one second beyond that.

4,205 posted on 09/13/2010 10:10:30 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4046 | View Replies]

To: Quix

“LOVE ME LOVE MY DOG”

Yeah, go back to pet rabbit.

I’m going to try something here...

I don’t KNOW

HERESY HERESY

How to !!!express! the

“PUT UP WITH ~~~~~~~ MY WACKY~~~~STYLE”

aNd treat ———————————————————BLASHPEHMY

it serious

LY!

mENTalITY, frame of mind, headset, quotient, makeup, mindset, outlook, personality, psychology, rationality, reasoning, turn of mind, understanding, way of thinking !!!!!!!!!FLIBBERYGIBBET!!!!!!!

THING!

WORDS
............................COCONUTS!
MO

RE WORD!S

There was a small hole in the blanket, I’m not sure if I froined it with a glibberyflat or not. Could have been BAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNaaaaNNNNNAAAAAAASSS now that I think of it.

RABiD dibar RabID CLIQUES CLICKS hicks DEMAND DEMAND

HARVEY BAINES and the council of diana TRENT!

WEELLLLLL Chop MY SUEY! HEWY I giotta be me! I

Can REJECT your conventions and dema!!!!!ND AcCePtAnCe OF

MY MY MY MY MYM YMYMYMY

_________________________________WAYofDoIngFINGS!

Well, I certainly feel better. Now, where were we? Oh yes. Rabbits in hutches.


4,206 posted on 09/13/2010 10:11:21 AM PDT by Legatus (From the desire of being esteemed, Deliver me, Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4184 | View Replies]

To: Legatus

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

that was slightly interesting .

Nice to see the effort anyway.

Glad you feel better.


4,207 posted on 09/13/2010 10:16:55 AM PDT by Quix (PAPAL AGENT DESIGNEE: Resident Filth of non-Roman Catholics; RC AGENT DESIGNATED: "INSANE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4206 | View Replies]

To: Quix
When the foundation is built largely on that mentality from the beginning . . .

I think it's the merger of the state with the church. The war on the Donatist's who were opposed to a pagan emperor being the head of the church is probably the turning point.

4,208 posted on 09/13/2010 10:18:01 AM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4204 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
I don't believe Unitarians are Reformation Evangelicals because I don't believe they were ever a part of the church you are a member of.

Unitarians broke away from the Congregational church (New England Puritans) -- or the Trinitarian Congregationalists broke away from the Unitarian Congregationalist, I guess, depending on how you look at it! I was surprised to see googling that many Unitarian churches keep the term Congregational in their name.

Those for whom Unitarianism (or Unitarian-Universalism) didn't go far enough morphed into Transcendantalists. According to Norman Pettit (a scholar of American Puritanism and its descendants), Ralph Waldo Emerson left the Unitarian Church shortly before he would have been thrown out.

4,209 posted on 09/13/2010 10:18:08 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4203 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

FLESH DRIVEN AUTHORITY LOVES CONTROL.

The whole business of cobbling together a magicsterical set of bureaucratic power-mongers to !!!!DEMAND!!!! that the See of Rome be pre-eminent

was a huge act of !!!!CONTROL!!!! FREAQUEISM

And it’s only worsened since then.


4,210 posted on 09/13/2010 10:22:13 AM PDT by Quix (PAPAL AGENT DESIGNEE: Resident Filth of non-Roman Catholics; RC AGENT DESIGNATED: "INSANE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4208 | View Replies]

To: Legatus

ROTFLMAO!!


4,211 posted on 09/13/2010 10:22:22 AM PDT by sitetest ( If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4206 | View Replies]

To: Legatus

LOL! Don’t stop now — you’re on a roll! ;-)


4,212 posted on 09/13/2010 10:32:25 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4206 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE; Mad Dawg; RnMomof7; Dr. Eckleburg; Quix; caww; Iscool; 1000 silverlings; TSgt; ...
I believe the insinuation "you would still be Catholic if it were not the fact you were so poorly catechized" is without merit. It would be equally in error to say "all poorly catechized Catholics are necessarily now ex-Catholic."

And the evidence is that not all ex-Catholics were poorly catechized.

It gets back to the mentality that if you knew what we REALLY believed, of course you'd believe as we do (or still believe as we do). It's beyond the comprehension of many Catholics that one could really, truly understand what the Catholic church teaches and still reject it. So they resort to the *You must have been poorly catechized* fallacy.

I was no more poorly catechized than the Catholics who I grew up with, and went to school with, and worked with, and was related to, who are still practicing Catholics.

My choice to reject the interpretations of the Catholic church are simply based on the fact that Scripture can be clearly and plainly read and, for the most part, easily understood by the average lay person. And that I saw discrepancies between what Scripture stated and what the RCC taught.

Tradition is NOT on equal par with Scripture. It says that nowhere in the Bible, and Christ Himself had a lot to say about the traditions of men, and none of it good. The only thing that gives weight to the concept that the tradition of the Catholic church is on equal footing with Scripture is,.... (drum roll) the tradition of the Catholic church.

Their tradition is what gives their tradition its weight. Pretty convenient, isn't it? They've got a nice, neat, little system all sewed up.

I would leave any church which did not teach Scripture but instead added it's own teachings which contradict it. If the church I attend now started teaching theology contradictory to Scripture, I'd leave it as well, if the leadership wouldn't relent.

4,213 posted on 09/13/2010 10:33:35 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4205 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
I think it's the merger of the state with the church.

The unmerger of state and religion is a relatively recent phenomenon. It post dates the Reformation also - see Westminster Confession, Calvin's Geneva, etc.

4,214 posted on 09/13/2010 10:38:17 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4208 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg; metmom
Because Mad Dawg didn't tell you the whole story. Maybe he forgot?

If somebody says that the Catholic Church does not allow married priests, my work is done if I show it has allowed one. And in fact, the frist time this came up I mentioned the uniate churches and the "pastoral provision." The recent outreach to disaffected Anglicans has been in the news, so I didn't think I had to mention that.

If somebody wants to exult in claims of knowledge, I tend to let them do their own research.


OK, but I don't agree with your reasoning. Some of your Catholic friends may interpret your explanation to mean all Priests may be married.

"The Catholic Church allows heretical Popes." My work is done if I show it has had one. Is that ok with you?

4,215 posted on 09/13/2010 10:46:54 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4047 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Their tradition is what gives their tradition its weight. Pretty convenient, isn't it? They've got a nice, neat, little system all sewed up.

Amen! You can fool some of the people some of the time...

The irony of this errant system is that its apologists insist it is an intellectual approach to theology. lol. How "intellectual" can it be when they can't even comprehend the simple words of Christ?

"Be not afraid; only believe." -- Mark 5:36

4,216 posted on 09/13/2010 10:47:58 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4213 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; Dr. Eckleburg; Quix
Why is it RC's what to be such control freaks and try to control the language?

Because they are at nature, control freaks? The Catholic church is well suited to obsessive-compulsives, all the ritual, doing exactly 50 hail mary's,counting beads, bow 3 times and spin once before sitting down, and all the rest they do

4,217 posted on 09/13/2010 10:48:56 AM PDT by 1000 silverlings (everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4203 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings; wmfights; Quix; metmom
Because they are at nature, control freaks? The Catholic church is well suited to obsessive-compulsives, all the ritual, doing exactly 50 hail mary's,counting beads, bow 3 times and spin once before sitting down, and all the rest they do

Exactly. That's one more reason why Rome distrusts the liberty of the Christian conscience. It cannot control it.

Thank God.

4,218 posted on 09/13/2010 11:00:24 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4217 | View Replies]

To: Quix; 1000 silverlings; metmom; wmfights
It is inaccurate to say I called Mary a pet rabbit.

ROTFLOL!

That's all.

Just ROTFLOL!!!

4,219 posted on 09/13/2010 11:03:06 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4165 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Isn’t control a main attribute of pharisees?


4,220 posted on 09/13/2010 11:03:41 AM PDT by marbren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4204 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 4,181-4,2004,201-4,2204,221-4,240 ... 15,821-15,828 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson