Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intended Catholic Dictatorship
Independent Individualist ^ | 8/27/10 | Reginald Firehammer

Posted on 08/27/2010 11:45:13 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief

Intended Catholic Dictatorship

The ultimate intention of Catholicism is the restoration of the Holy Roman Empire. That has always been the ambition, at least covertly, but now it is being promoted overtly and openly.

The purpose of this article is only to make that intention clear. It is not a criticism of Catholics or Catholicism (unless you happen to think a Catholic dictatorship is not a good thing).

The most important point is to understand that when a Catholic talks about liberty or freedom, it is not individual liberty that is meant, not the freedom to live one's life as a responsible individual with the freedom to believe as one chooses, not the freedom to pursue happiness, not the freedom to produce and keep what one has produced as their property. What Catholicism means by freedom, is freedom to be a Catholic, in obedience to the dictates of Rome.

The Intentions Made Plain

The following is from the book Revolution and Counter-Revolution:

"B. Catholic Culture and Civilization

"Therefore, the ideal of the Counter-Revolution is to restore and promote Catholic culture and civilization. This theme would not be sufficiently enunciated if it did not contain a definition of what we understand by Catholic culture and Catholic civilization. We realize that the terms civilization and culture are used in many different senses. Obviously, it is not our intention here to take a position on a question of terminology. We limit ourselves to using these words as relatively precise labels to indicate certain realities. We are more concerned with providing a sound idea of these realities than with debating terminology.

"A soul in the state of grace possesses all virtues to a greater or lesser degree. Illuminated by faith, it has the elements to form the only true vision of the universe.

"The fundamental element of Catholic culture is the vision of the universe elaborated according to the doctrine of the Church. This culture includes not only the learning, that is, the possession of the information needed for such an elaboration, but also the analysis and coordination of this information according to Catholic doctrine. This culture is not restricted to the theological, philosophical, or scientific field, but encompasses the breadth of human knowledge; it is reflected in the arts and implies the affirmation of values that permeate all aspects of life.

"Catholic civilization is the structuring of all human relations, of all human institutions, and of the State itself according to the doctrine of the Church.

Got that? "Catholic civilization is the structuring of all human relations, of all human institutions, and of the State itself according to the doctrine of the Church." The other name for this is called "totalitarianism," the complete rule of every aspect of life.

This book and WEB sites like that where it is found are spreading like wildfire. These people do not believe the hope of America is the restoration of the liberties the founders sought to guarantee, these people believe the only hope for America is Fatima. Really!

In Their Own Words

The following is from the site, "RealCatholicTV." It is a plain call for a "benevolent dictatorship, a Catholic monarch;" their own words. They even suggest that when the "Lord's Payer," is recited, it is just such a Catholic dictatorship that is being prayed for.

[View video in original here or on Youtube. Will not show in FR.]

Two Comments

First, in this country, freedom of speech means that anyone may express any view no matter how much anyone else disagrees with that view, or is offended by it. I totally defend that meaning of freedom of speech.

This is what Catholics believe, and quite frankly, I do not see how any consistent Catholic could disagree with it, though I suspect some may. I have no objection to their promoting those views, because it is what they believe. Quite frankly I am delighted they are expressing them openly. For one thing, it makes it much easier to understand Catholic dialog, and what they mean by the words they use.

Secondly, I think if their views were actually implemented, it would mean the end true freedom, of course, but I do not believe there is any such danger.

—Reginald Firehammer (06/28/10)


TOPICS: Activism; Catholic; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: individualliberty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,521-3,5403,541-3,5603,561-3,580 ... 15,821-15,828 next last
To: Mad Dawg

There’s a big difference between the church not offering the cup as part of communion for centuries, in lack of obedience to Christ’s commands and example, and someone who is not able to partake of part of the element due to medical reasons.

And correct me if I’m wrong, but does the Church not have rice wafers for such a contingency?

Both elements should be offered and taken as possible because of the example and command of Christ Himself. The church not even offering the cup to parishioners is irresponsible and does a disservice to them in denying them the opportunity to fully participate in communion as Christ and His disciples did.

As far as people not drinking of the cup because of fear of illness, why doesn’t the Catholic church do as the Evangelical ones do and have small disposable cups to hold the wine/grape juice/ fruit of the vine?

That would address the hygiene concerns.


3,541 posted on 09/10/2010 11:36:36 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3525 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
We have been told many times by numerous RCs that in order to be stricken from the RCC membership roles a person must write to their bishop and formally withdraw from the faith in order not to be counted as a member.

What you're talking about is a formal act of defection. Yeah, write the bishop and a notation will be made in the baptismal register of the parish of record. That has nothing to do with the active register by which census numbers are reported. Only one parish can count any individual at a given time, and only one parish would want to.

Each parish keeps sacramental records and an active parishioner roll, annually the parish will report baptisms, marriages, receptions into full communion, funerals, etc as well as "active parishioners". The "active parishioner" number is where the number of practicing Catholics comes from. If they just totaled up everything there'd be more Catholics on earth than people.

St. Whoozits doesn't want you on the register if you're going to St. Thingys because that'll mess up the parish census for St. Whoozits and because St. Whoozits might get stuck with the subsidy for you if you enroll your kids in St. Bobbys parish school. Nevermind that the pastor of St. Whoozits will have to face an angry bishop if he's got 10,000 people registered as active parishioners and his weekly collections are only coming from 500 envelopes.

3,542 posted on 09/10/2010 11:37:09 AM PDT by Legatus (From the desire of being esteemed, Deliver me, Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3514 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings

Well, YOU can’t even spell edumication! Pot - Kettle - that dark color, reminiscent of Charon.

Have you seen the Dore’ engravings for the Inferno? Zowie!


3,543 posted on 09/10/2010 11:37:19 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3528 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Quix
Most sources say there's one billion RCs. Somehow, even with its dwindling membership and its closed churches and seminaries, Rome has inflated that number by 20%.

It wouldn't be all that surprising for a variety of reasons. I don't think they will disappear though, because there are aspects to this church that are very attractive to a lot of people.

3,544 posted on 09/10/2010 11:37:34 AM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3532 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
If Jack Van Impe had been broadcasting in the Middle Ages, all kinds of end-times prophecies would have been seen.

LOL

The people would have really been looking to their Bibles to see if he was right!

3,545 posted on 09/10/2010 11:40:35 AM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3538 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; marbren; D-fendr
The nation of Israel came back into existence and Jews started returning to it. A huge prophetic event.

I'm not disputing the signficance of that, but from the viewpoint of disasters it hasn't been that severe. And the fact remains that nearly every generation for the past two thousand years has had something that they pointed to that some thought represented End Times.

3,546 posted on 09/10/2010 11:42:24 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3534 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

yes, and now when you crow how you will “ferry the unlearned souls hereon from one spot to the next”, since none of them are as unlearned as the ferryman, you will see that they’ve already crossed in another boat.John 6:21


3,547 posted on 09/10/2010 11:44:33 AM PDT by 1000 silverlings (everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3531 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I THINK, but do not know, NO rice wafers, because it has to be wheaten bread.

But the question was what is the celiac person missing? Anything? That would help evaluate the gravity of withholding the chalice. I agree that there’s a difference.

(Incidentally your “big difference” is a fine example of the REALITY of what I’m calling “ideas”.)

“shot glasses” (as we disrespectfully called them at my Episcopal seminary), I don’t think there would be an objection in principle. I don’t know how “drop dead do not ever break this rule” this particular rule is, but I THINK there’s a rule that the inner surface of the bread container (paten or ciborium) or the wine vessel (chalice) should be gold, ceteris paribus.


3,548 posted on 09/10/2010 11:44:52 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3541 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
And the fact remains that nearly every generation for the past two thousand years has had something that they pointed to that some thought represented End Times.

2 Peter 3:4 (New International Version) 4They will say, "Where is this 'coming' he promised? Ever since our fathers died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation."

3,549 posted on 09/10/2010 11:48:22 AM PDT by marbren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3546 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
I THINK, but do not know, NO rice wafers, because it has to be wheaten bread.

From the website of the USCCB:
Can a priest or bishop change this teaching and consecrate a host made of rice??

No. It is impossible to consecrate a host made of something other than wheat and water. No priest or bishop can change this longstanding teaching of the Catholic Church. A little over a year ago, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, once again took up this question on behalf of the Holy Father when he wrote: “Hosts that are completely gluten-free are invalid matter for the celebration of the Eucharist.”2 Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, circular letter to the Presidents of Conferences of Bishops, July 24, 2003 (Prot. 89/78-174/98) in BCL Newsletter, November 2003 (Vol. XXXIX), p. 45.

The Jesuits raised this question for reasons of inculturation when they entered China (or was it Japan?) in the 1600s, they got the same answer then.

3,550 posted on 09/10/2010 11:49:16 AM PDT by Legatus (From the desire of being esteemed, Deliver me, Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3548 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings
yes, and now when you crow how you will “ferry the unlearned souls hereon from one spot to the next”, since none of them are as unlearned as the ferryman, you will see that they’ve already crossed in another boat.John 6:21

All I see is a post of crowing.

3,551 posted on 09/10/2010 11:53:38 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3547 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr; wmfights

But the key is Israel.

Israel has become a nation again, back in 1948.

The Middle ages couldn’t have fulfilled the prophecy in Daniel that says,....

http://bible.cc/daniel/12-4.htm

Daniel 12:4 “But you, Daniel, shut up the words and seal the book, until the time of the end. Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase.””

Ezekiel 38 and 39 describe end times scenarios that could not have been fulfilled during the Middle ages.

Moscow is about due north of Israel, the uttermost north. Persia is Iran.

Here is a link that offers some explanations about which countries could be the ones mentioned in Ezekiel 38 and 39.
http://contenderministries.org/prophecy/gogmagogPF.php


3,552 posted on 09/10/2010 11:54:32 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3538 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; marbren; D-fendr
..., but from the viewpoint of disasters it hasn't been that severe. And the fact remains that nearly every generation for the past two thousand years has had something that they pointed to that some thought represented End Times.

I wouldn't disagree that each generation is susceptible to believing the disasters they are experiencing are unique. The letters written to the Thessalonians is a good case in point. These letters offer a lot of insight into what to expect as far as the sequence of events because the Thessalonians thought they had been "left behind" and Paul was explaining to them what had to happen first. So we see in Scripture the same tendency in the generation following the Crucifixion.

There is pretty clear prophecy that tells us when we are very close to the return of Jesus Christ. The reformation of Israel. The return of Jews to Israel. A peace treaty with Israel and the muslim nations that want to kill all the Jews. The rebuilding of the Temple. Some of these things have occurred and some haven't. From my perspective it could be tomorrow, or a 1,000 years I don't know. I do believe it is sooner rather than later.

3,553 posted on 09/10/2010 11:55:22 AM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3546 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; wmfights; NYer; Salvation; Pyro7480; Coleus; narses; annalex; Campion; don-o; ...
Anyone can google "number of Roman Catholics worldwide" and see for themselves the disparity in numbers.

Learn something.

Let's see then:

The latest estimate from the Vatican is 1.16 billion.

WikiAnswers suggests 1.3 billion (significantly MORE than the 1 billion you claim).

Wikipedia reports the same number as the Catholic Church.

The BBC lists about 1.1 billion, but that was several years before the latest Vatican numbers.

In other words, ALL of these numbers are fairly consistent (though WikiAnswers is higher) and NONE of them suggest that the Catholic Church is overstating the number of members.

So I will ask yet again, can you name a reputable group with verifiable methods that suggests there is a significantly lower number of Catholics?

Would that be termed a "lie" since I have never claimed "omniscience" and you cannot prove your slander true?

It is generally understood that omniscience is required to know for a certainty the truth of what is in another person's heart.

3,554 posted on 09/10/2010 11:58:44 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3539 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

I agree with you.


3,555 posted on 09/10/2010 11:59:59 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3553 | View Replies]

To: Legatus; Mad Dawg

Interesting.

In Indonesia, where the staple of the diet is sweet potatoes not wheat, when the Protestant missionaries were discussing what to do about communion for the Christian nationals, some of them decided that it would give communion more meaning to portray Jesus as the sweet potato of life, something they could understand and really identify with, as opposed to bringing in wheat whatever and portraying Jesus as the *foreigners food of life*.

An interesting concept and one that works if one recognizes the symbolism of communion.


3,556 posted on 09/10/2010 12:00:21 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3550 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

It is interesting how the question of, What happens to the USA? is getting clearer.


3,557 posted on 09/10/2010 12:01:22 PM PDT by marbren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3553 | View Replies]

To: metmom; D-fendr
But the key is Israel.

I agree!

I think the time we start "running to the hills" is when the Temple begins to be rebuilt. Right now there is that dumb shrine to the anti-christ mohammed sitting on the spot it needs to be built on. I don't see that being removed right away, but an earthquake tomorrow could change that.

3,558 posted on 09/10/2010 12:02:02 PM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3552 | View Replies]

To: metmom
I never explored Unitarian doctrine and never had much need or desire to, so I’ve never given your question much thought. I don’t know right now.

Some are Trinitarians. Some are not.
Some believe in the divinity of Jesus. Some don't.
Some are Christian. Some aren't.
They can be almost anything---or not.

IOW it is not possible to "know" what Unitarians believe. Any person who purports to is either a liar or arrogantly stupid.

3,559 posted on 09/10/2010 12:03:51 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3304 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I agree with you.

Thanks

Now all we have to do is get everyone else on board and get rid of obama and the Rats. ;-)

3,560 posted on 09/10/2010 12:05:16 PM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3555 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,521-3,5403,541-3,5603,561-3,580 ... 15,821-15,828 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson