Posted on 08/27/2010 11:45:13 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
I’m not sure if the answer is in your reply.
Just to be clear, does “As it stands, regarding the Trinity, the “quotation” you provided is gibberish” mean you the quotation shows an incorrect understanding of the Trinity?
Just to be clear, does "As it stands, regarding the Trinity, the "quotation" you provided is gibberish" mean you the quotation shows an incorrect understanding of the Trinity?
I take exception to your statement that Mark Bsnr’s post 10434 is gibberish.
Actually, it doesn't take a paragraph...
"Thy graven images also will I cut off, and thy standing images out of the midst of thee; and thou shalt no more worship the work of thine hands." -- Micah 5:13
"And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people." -- 2 Corinthians 6:16 "I have even from the beginning declared it to thee; before it came to pass I shewed it thee: lest thou shouldest say, Mine idol hath done them, and my graven image, and my molten image, hath commanded them." -- Isaiah 48:5
lol. Why?
Frankly I wonder if you have forgotten what you called gibberish, and needed someone to point it out to you. In your post 10437, you called Mark Bsnr’s post 10434 “gibberish.”
If and when you choose to give up the games and get around to actually being able to discuss a topic, you let us know.
lol. Because.
Yes, and why do you take exception to the fact I called Mark’s post gibberish?
I really don’t have a problem with catholics having various opinions about Rome...but The Vatican might have something to say about it if they vere off from their direction I would think.
Protestants differ as well....so did the Apostles from time to time..and certainly the Jewish leaders differed in their day. And all the faiths do seem to differ from within their denominsations and or various bodies.
What I do have a problem with are the contridictions between Rome and what we see posted. If Rome is infalliable in the Popes position and the teachings from them....then if catholics go their own way yet claim they adhere to Romes teachings and what the Popes declare..then either Rome is wrong or the Bishops over their churches are.
Thanks for proving my point. You appear not to know what’s being discussed. You just offer your negation...of something. Not sure of what.
Hmmmm....making it personal AGAIN, I see.
I'm sorry, you do remember your statement: "Until you can show us "on this thread" where the "reformed" have an incorrect understanding of the Trinity.."
I nominated "Jesus body carried God."
You called it gibberish.
I'm trying to determine now if that means you consider it as qualifying under the conditions of your challenge.
This is the topic I'm discussing.
Well, I actually DO know what WAS being discussed. If you have forgotten that, as well as the post you called gibberish, please let me know, and I’ll be happy to refresh your memory.
Sorry, should have pinged you to the previous.
LOLROTF...this is hysterical..everybodies arguing about “gibberish”. I’m laughing so hard my side hurts!
>Once again, as I said before, I take exception to your statement that Mark Bsnr’s post 10434 is gibberish. If you have forgotten his post, I encourage you to refresh your memory.
I nominated "Jesus body carried God."
And I asked you to give us evidence where any "reformed" made that statement regarding the Trinity.
Debating hypotheticals is one thing. Debating fiction is quite another.
Why do you take exception to it? What are you agreeing with that Mark said? What did Mark write that is not gibberish?
Apparently this is just a general "me, too" without knowing what's being discussed.
15,000
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.