OK Deb, review time. In post 106 CC replied to your question with mormon doctrine as an answer to your question. It starts pointing out the differences between the mormon jesus and the Christian Jesus.
In post 113 (your reply to 106) you accuse CC of " distorting the meaning ". Now I find your later statements that you are seeking to learn more juxtaposed against that statement. Your first step needs to be acknowledging that the mormon definitions are correct.
Now who was the first to strike out sister? Instead of being humble and acknowledging that a former mormon, presenting the information you say you are looking for is being snarky for providing the correct information - you start dismissing the information as snarky and hateful. Go ahead and go back up the thread Deb and prove me wrong otherwise.
Please, go shopping and clear your head. If you want answers, we'll still be here in one form or another. However, calling experts 'snarky' is not the way to accomplish it.
How can I acknowledge "that the mormon definitions are correct" if I know nothing about it and am asking questions?
I didn't "strike out", I said she was "snarky". That seems playful to me which is how I meant it. When I strike out you'll need bandages.
All this sanctimony coming from someone named "Godzilla" is truly hilarious. And it seems to me that people who are Mormons on this thread are displaying oceans more charity and generosity of spirit that the ones who need to slap down people who are trying to understand.