Well put. Alamo-girl, there is no simple one-worder. God is complex. We know what He is not. Mother of the Incarnate Word leaves room for the possibilities of Arius (i.e. that Christ was not God or not THE God but a “godling” or a “sub-god” or an angel or a demiurge) or Nestorius (that Christ was not wholly man and wholly God, hence God did not suffer for us) or Adoptionism (that Jesus was “possessed” by the Holy Spirit)
I am combining my response in one post so that I don't take up space repeating myself. And I ask your understanding, dear Mad Dawg, for using my regular font size as this post is too long for the big font.
As Quix noted earlier, to him and evidently many others the Name of God, Almighty, is taken to mean God the Father. As with the Name of God, God, this is to be expected upon reading passages such as this (emphasis mine):
His eyes [were] as a flame of fire, and on his head [were] many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. And he [was] clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.
And the armies [which were] in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.
And he hath on [his] vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS. Revelation 19:11-16
John to the seven churches which are in Asia: Grace [be] unto you, and peace, from him which is, and which was, and which is to come; and from the seven Spirits which are before his throne; And from Jesus Christ, [who is] the faithful witness, [and] the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood, And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him [be] glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they [also] which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.
I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty. - Revelation 1:1-8
But man is not the measure of God!
The Laws of Logic are part of the creation, not a property or restriction on the Creator of them. We must lay them aside in our meditations on the Names of God.
And again, the Law of Identity does not apply to God.
Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us.
Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou [then], Shew us the Father?
Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.
Believe me that I [am] in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works' sake. - John 14:7-11
In effect the speaker must deconstruct the Trinity into three separate identities in order to convey what is actually meant by that title and then reconstitute the Name of God, God, so that they do not misunderstand that the title is not meant to be a reduction of the Name of God, God, as in the Triune God.
Praise God that there are Names of God which apply only to the Incarnate Word: Word, Jesus, Christ, Messiah, Emmanuel, etc.
And so I personally can and do avoid causing confusion to the youngers (who are probably not yet ready for a lesson in the Law of Identity and why it does not apply to the Creator of it) - by simply using the title "Mother of the Incarnate Word."
Like I said before, it is the same issue we have when admiring Michaelangelo's Creation of Adam with a younger. We do the younger a disservice if we do not carefully explain that God is not an old gray-haired man on a cloud.
God's Name is I AM.