Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad Dawg; Alamo-Girl; betty boop; Amityschild; Brad's Gramma; Captain Beyond; Cvengr; DvdMom; ...

MOST FOLKS I KNOW

construe

GOD to = GOD ALMIGHTY

or . . . as a collective term for The Trinity.

RC’s get slippery and absurd with the term to justify calling Mary the Mother of GOD.

OF COURSE JESUS IS GOD.

THAT’S NEVER AN ISSUE.

Casting Mary as the MOTHER OF GOD

is essentially, in context, false advertising. It is deceptive, disingenuous, false,

and carries all manner of nuances that are UNBIBLICAL and worse.

I can’t imagine ever feeling comfortable with the term. It sets my spirit on edge as a manipulation, a verbal slight of hand, a seductive trick.

Dreadful.


6,225 posted on 08/03/2010 8:08:11 PM PDT by Quix (THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6222 | View Replies ]


To: Quix; Mad Dawg

MOST FOLKS I KNOW

construe

GOD to = GOD ALMIGHTY

or . . . as a collective term for The Trinity.

RC’s get slippery and absurd with the term to justify calling Mary the Mother of GOD.

OF COURSE JESUS IS GOD.

THAT’S NEVER AN ISSUE.

Casting Mary as the MOTHER OF GOD

is essentially, in context, false advertising. It is deceptive, disingenuous, false,

and carries all manner of nuances that are UNBIBLICAL and worse.

I can’t imagine ever feeling comfortable with the term. It sets my spirit on edge as a manipulation, a verbal slight of hand, a seductive trick.

**********************************************************************

Exactly.....


6,236 posted on 08/03/2010 8:26:36 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6225 | View Replies ]

To: Quix; presently no screen name; Iscool; boatbums; RnMomof7; the_conscience; count-your-change; ...

It certainly appears that the Catholic church never means what it says.

We’ve posted time and again things that the Catholic church has stated from its own website and in virtually every case, we’ve been told that the clear, plain meaning of what was printed is not what the Catholic church *really* teaches, or what it *really* means.

I’ve never seen such duplicity in my entire life.


6,247 posted on 08/03/2010 8:43:48 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6225 | View Replies ]

To: Quix
I'm trying to shut down for the night here. I just was trying to clarify usage.

The Trinity is hard. But it was clearly "God the Son of God" whom Mary conceived. I find it less outrageous if I think of Philippians and the humility of God and His willingness to "bear any burden" to sneak into the world.

In one of our ancient hymns, the Te Deum, we say

Tu, ad liberandum suscepturus hominem, non horuisti Virginis uterum.

You, when you resolved to free man, did not abhor the Virgin's womb.

This is addressed to "Tu Rex gloriae, Christe" -- You, the king of glory, O Christ"

Certainly the Father was not conceived in the Virgin's womb. And the Holy Spirit made it happen, so He wasn't conceived -- it was by His power that the conceiving happened.

On the other hand the Son is God.

My head is exploding.

6,267 posted on 08/03/2010 9:18:15 PM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee. here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6225 | View Replies ]

To: Mad Dawg

or . . . as a collective term for The Trinity.


MD, this must have been where you got that from me at the referent post.

I think here, I was groping to cover all the possible reasonable bases.


7,293 posted on 08/06/2010 2:12:21 PM PDT by Quix (THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson