Words not posted by a Catholic and deceptively posted here as if they were.
As for the words in Timothy. No Catholic disputes that all of Scripture is inspired of God and contains all that is needed to know of Jesus and of His saving sacrifice.
What did I post deceptively? All I did is copy and post from the comments put up by the FReepers. It’s their words, not mine.
I don’t know what you mean about “Words not posted by a Catholic and deceptively posted here as if they were.” Natural Law claims to be a Catholic, unless he’s had an epiphany in the last couple hours.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2554678/posts?page=3375#3375
small voice in the wilderness (post 3,375): “THANK YOU Reggie, for that. It seems the Scripture’s PLAIN wording isn’t enough. How hard can it be to read what the word says? Unless you don’t LIKE what it says. Then what to do? I guess one can always start a religion, based not on what God’s Word says but traditions that say something very different...”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2554678/posts?page=3376#3376
Natural Law (post 3,376): “ Of course it isn’t or God would not have added to the revealed Word of God through Apostolic tradition and subsequent revelation.
To attempt to comprehend the entire revealed Word of God from Scripture alone is like trying to play solitaire with an incomplete deck. “