To: Cronos
I cannot take time now to answer your posts as I must go to work. Perhaps tonight..but any are certainly free to dispute what they will...and usually do in order to somehow make out the Inquisition was not that bad. It was and the Internet has volumes of information for any to seek the answers...People who denied the Holocausts also attempted to defend what happened...but it happened none the less and just as we know the evidence is plentiful.
2,599 posted on
07/27/2010 4:29:47 AM PDT by
caww
To: caww
2,603 posted on
07/27/2010 4:34:05 AM PDT by
Quix
(THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
To: caww
People who denied the Holocausts also attempted to defend Godwin's Rule bump to that.
snort!
2,608 posted on
07/27/2010 5:53:20 AM PDT by
don-o
(Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
To: caww
oh, sure, I checked the net too -- and the Inquisition in comparison to the other Medieval courts was easier.
Do all the research you like and ask the preachermen who told you those errors what they think of a 2% conviction rate? Ask them what they think of the number of 3000 to 5000 killed in 200 years too.
The Inquisition WAS bad, but it was nowhere near the level of those killed in the 30 years war and is laughable to compare it to a real tragedy like hte Holocaust.
CAn you find any proof or links to doubt those figures of 2% conviction rate and total executions = 3000 to 5000 over 200 years?
2,621 posted on
07/27/2010 7:53:01 AM PDT by
Cronos
(Omnia mutantur, nihil interit)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson