[Natural Law]

"the Vatican is never wrong."

Perhaps you could explain how, paradoxically, the Vatican can possibly be wrong when it states, with a great deal of specificity, what it means and defines the terms it uses in the process.

[Quix]

I'm not sure
WHAT'S MORE
OUTRAGEOUSLY
HILARIOUS!
.
That someone would write
SUCH BRAZENLY FALSE ASSERTIONS
.
OR
.
That evidently most
RC'S HEREON
COULD BELIEVE
SUCH
UNMITIGATED
BRAZENLY
UNTRUE
BALDERDASH!
LOL!
.
I don't think
"willfully blind and deaf"
is a remotely adequate description
to describe such terminal lack of
awareness
on the part of such a huge
percentage of RC's hereon.

Evidently they HONESTLY BELIEVE that the Vatican publishes coherent, homogeneous, non-contradictory assertions of belief that make sense, are remotely logical etc. INCREDIBLE. Evidently the Vatican delcared mirrors anathema as well as Proddys.