[Quix]

I'm not sure
WHAT'S MORE
OUTRAGEOUSLY
HILARIOUS!
.
That someone would write
SUCH BRAZENLY FALSE ASSERTIONS
.
OR
.
That evidently most
RC'S HEREON
COULD BELIEVE
SUCH
UNMITIGATED
BRAZENLY
UNTRUE
BALDERDASH!
LOL!
.
I don't think
"willfully blind and deaf"
is a remotely adequate description
to describe such terminal lack of
awareness
on the part of such a huge
percentage of RC's hereon.

Evidently they HONESTLY BELIEVE that the Vatican publishes coherent, homogeneous, non-contradictory assertions of belief that make sense, are remotely logical etc. INCREDIBLE. Evidently the Vatican delcared mirrors anathema as well as Proddys.

[Captain Beyond]

Mirrors by Blue Oyster Cult
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1HrO2W6w-4

Mirrors

( - D. Roeser - B. Abbott - )

A mirror is a negative space
With a frame and a place for your face
It reveals what the rest of us see
It conceals what you’d like it to be

Pretty girls can’t look away
Pretty girls can’t look away
Pretty girls can’t look away
Pretty girls can’t look away

Pretty girls have a love afair
With their eyes and their shining hair
Fantasize that the world adores
Tantalize like a cover girl

Mirrors are the basis of beauty
Give rise to self love or self pity
The prize if a woman is pretty
She tries like a superstar Hollywood girl

Pretty girls can’t look away
Pretty girls can’t look away
Pretty girls can’t look away
Pretty girls can’t look away

Vanity’s a deadly sin
It’s what the flesh is packaged in
Vanity’s a deadly sin
It’s what the flesh is packaged in

A mirror is a negative space
With a frame and a place for your face
It reveals what the rest of us see
It conceals what you’d like it to be

Vanity’s a deadly sin
It’s what the flesh is packaged in

[Natural Law]

Completely incomprehensible! When people make a reference to Orwell you should assume they are referring to his "Rules for Writers". Honestly, anyone who writes with such complete disregard for the rules of grammar, composition, and logic has no grounds to quibble with the Vatican over the meanings of its writing.

That being said, it was anticipatable that a definitive question would be met with the HTML equivalent of a cephalopod's ink cloud. I do, however, understand your reluctance to admit ignorance.