It seems that you didn't re-read it. A little thought and it becomes obvious - hidden in plain sight. It was in the form of a question about whether you would accept free will if it were demonstrated.
The question was: ""If Free Will was demonstrated to be true, would you accept it?"
You said you wouldn't, no matter how much proof, because... And gave your reasons and discussion, and then reaffirmed your answer.
You have considered the evidence and conditions, and arrived at your decision. Thus you demonstrated your free will.
Naturally, this cannot be acceptable proof to you as you have stated that no amount of proof matters to you in this area.
But, I do appreciate your participation in the demonstration.
Again, we'll all wait for you to produce the post where I "said I wouldn't."
But, I do appreciate your participation in the demonstration.
The only thing that's been demonstrated is that you don't know how to run a demonstration.
For clarity's sake, here is your request and my answer...
I answered your question. Help me out then. Was it "Yes" "No" or "Maybe"? 978 posted on 07/15/2010 7:38:15 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: D-fendr Are you stalling? Yes. Sure. Alrighty. Definitely. Absolutely. But of course. Mais, qui. You betcha...To: Dr. Eckleburg
And here I "helped you out" and STILL you missed my answer.
I guess your free will has been trumped by mine. Imagine what God could do with that set-up. Do you think He knows about it?