Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Belteshazzar
Yawn.

I've never found Dr. Ice to be in Biblical error in any of his writings.

However, I have been treated to endless twisting and denial and allegorizing and redefining of Scripture by replacement theologians, preterists, amillennialists, and so forth and so on.

So you'll forgive me if I take the word of the writer who I have never found to be Scripturally wrong.

165 posted on 07/03/2010 2:50:02 PM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: GiovannaNicoletta

“Yawn.”

Your link: http://www.bible-prophecy-today.com/2010/06/why-rebirth-of-israel-is-sign-of-end.html#axzz0sehetZgw

The author, identified as Jack Kelly at the beginning of the article, is simply, flatly, indisputably wrong on the point I just posted. Yawn all you want. He is wrong. I know how to assess his argument. Perhaps, you are helping me to assess yours.


167 posted on 07/03/2010 3:19:40 PM PDT by Belteshazzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

WELL PUT. LOL.


218 posted on 07/03/2010 9:55:02 PM PDT by Quix (THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

To: GiovannaNicoletta
I've never found Dr. Ice to be in Biblical error in any of his writings.

However, I have been treated to endless twisting and denial and allegorizing and redefining of Scripture by replacement theologians, preterists, amillennialists, and so forth and so on.

When are you going to ease off of your arrogance and contempt towards the Saints of God? Who are you to say that the greatest theologians in the past two thousand years are "endlessly twisting" the Scriptures? Exactly what are your credentials to determine if someone is "endlessly twisting" Scripture? Have you published any papers that substantiate your ability to handle the original languages, properly exegete a passage, offer coherent lower criticism on the received texts or are you completely relying on random sensationalistic crap you find posted on the internet, and from hyperventilating hosts on The Blasphemers Network (TBN) for the basis of your religious opinions?

Are you saying that Hal Lindsey is one of the greatest expositor of Ezekiel, Daniel, the Gospels and Revelation just because he thinks locusts are Apache helicopters?

Are St. Paul, Augustine, Calvin, Aquinas, Luther, Owens, Edwards, Spurgeon, Hodge, Barnes, et al all guilty of massive "denial, allegorizing and redefining Scripture"? Is everyone a demon who doesn't subscribe to the heresy of Dispensationalism? We need to know if you reject sound biblical teaching, the creeds and confessions and prefer the wild fables and false teachings of contemporary TV evangelists and scammers.

As a quick and simple test of your exemplarly skills in biblical interpretation and exposition, please, for all of us rubes, liars and heretics, please define the pejorative "Replacement Theologians" and identify anyone here who fits that definition. (I seriously doubt you can) Otherwise, for sake of common decency and civility, lay off the insults there is absolutely nothing charitable nor Christian about your invective.

265 posted on 07/03/2010 11:16:51 PM PDT by The Theophilus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson