these two verses talk about the same person the Messiah, You can not say one is about Jesus and then the next one is about an anti-christ. It is not good bible reading verse 27 says nothing about a anti-christ. Jesus consummated the covenant after 3.5 years which caused the requirement of the sacrifice to end.
When Jesus Christ was crucified, did He come back to life and continue His ruling over the entire world?
"the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary" - the people that destroyed the sanctuary (Temple, in 70AD) were the Romans and "the prince that shall come" will be of the people who destroyed the Temple in 70AD.
The fact that the Temple was destroyed after Jesus was crucified nukes your entire assertion, but I'll play along.
Since the destruction of the Temple occurred after Christ's crucifixion, are you still going to maintain that 1. Jesus was of Roman descent and 2. Jesus died, was brought back to life by Satan, desecrated the Temple, forced the Jews to stop their sacrifices, ruled over the entire world, was referred to as the "Beast" throughout Scripture, and confirmed a seven-year peace contract between Israel and her enemies?
One, last time, I'm going to need the Scripture that inarguably shows that Jesus Christ was the guy who met all of the characteristics listed above that the Bible states will be attributes of the guy who confirms the seven-year peace contract between Israel and her enemies.
If I don't see that supporting Scripture in your next post, I'll know that you simply cannot support your assertion that Jesus Christ ever confirmed a seven-year peace contract between Israel and her enemies and will know that that nonsense can be permanently dismissed.
I thought maybe you were confusing 3 score and 2 weeks with 3-1/2 years. A score is 20 years. So 3 score is 60, and 3 score and 2 is 62.
Just and fyi, if you made that mistake.