Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Titanites; Amityschild; Brad's Gramma; Cvengr; DvdMom; firebrand; GiovannaNicoletta; Godzilla; ...
AS I NOTED AT THE TIME,

I included my INTERPRETATION in the context of the verse concerned--IN BRACKETS ([]).

Perhaps the 2 year old education of the Vatican affiliate rabid clique folks has not included yet, the common educated knowledge of literate folks the world over that brackets in quoted material is from other than that material--typically, from the person doing the quoting.

NOW, y'all can understand that, perhaps. I'm not placing any bets.

I also more or less noted AT THAT TIME, that y'all's mangled, irrational, inconsistent interpretation was not owned honestly in anyway. Y'all have just been pretending that y'all's mangled interpretation was HOLY WRIT in toto.

THANKFULLY, PRODDYS hereon are 'onto that' nonsense. We can smell the stink coming & SLATHERED OFFENSIVELY ON THE TRUE UNRUBBERIZED BIBLE, a long way off.

964 posted on 06/21/2010 6:00:47 PM PDT by Quix (THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 956 | View Replies ]


To: Quix
I included my INTERPRETATION

Yes, you inserted your own words into Scripture just as Luther did. He had his reasons, you had yours. Either way, that’s rubberizing.

AS I NOTED AT THE TIME,

You didn't note it at the time. It wasn't until I asked for clarification. The Bible versions I have use the same brackets you did, so I had to ask.

1,023 posted on 06/21/2010 10:41:00 PM PDT by Titanites (Not by Faith Alone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 964 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson