I included my INTERPRETATION Yes, you inserted your own words into Scripture just as Luther did. He had his reasons, you had yours. Either way, that’s rubberizing.
AS I NOTED AT THE TIME,
You didn't note it at the time. It wasn't until I asked for clarification. The Bible versions I have use the same brackets you did, so I had to ask.
Yes, it was in response to your reply . . . within seconds or a minute or soof my original post, IIRC. I guess I'll have to format them differently or use "{}" to signify my own interpretation.
Y'all
INSERT
YOUR WORDS
YOUR BRAZENLY
UNSCRIPTURAL
FANTASIES
INTO SCRIPTURE
AS THOUGH
YOUR WORDS
WERE
ORIGINAL SCRIPTURE
ITSELF
--
ALL THE TIME!
***WITHOUT***
HAVING THE INTEGRITY
OF
BRACKETS
OR
ADMITTING IT
TO ANY DEGREE
IN ANY WAY!
Y'ALL INSIST THAT
"FULL OF GRACE"
EQUALS
"QUEEN OF HEAVEN,"
"DISPENSER OF
ALL
GRACES,"
"!MEDIATRIX!"
"!RULER OF HELL!"
"!THE TREE OF LIFE!"
{!WHAT BLASPHEMY!}
"SPOUSE OF HOLY SPIRIT,"
"!COMPLEMENT OF THE MOST AUGUST TRINITY!"
{!WHAT BLASPHEMY!}
"THE DAWN OF GOD,"
"!VANQUISHER OF SIN!"
{!WHAT BLASPHEMY!}
"THE !ONLY 'AVENUE' TO GOD!"
{!WHAT BLASPHEMY!}
'SALVATION CONDUIT'
{!WHAT BLASPHEMY!}
"SAVIOR OF SOULS"
{!WHAT BLASPHEMY!}
"'PARTICIPATOR' IN THE
INFINITE SANCTITY OF GOD!"
{!WHAT BLASPHEMY!}
I'm CERTAIN y'all were 100% convinced that Quix thought he was AUTHORING ORIGINAL SCRIPTURE within the "[]" brackets! /SARCASM TO THE MAX.
So, PLEASE TELL US,
IN YOUR OWN VIEW
which of the methods
DEPICTED ABOVE
LACKS INTEGRITY,
LACKS HONESTY,
IS DECEPTIVE,
AND WHICH DOES NOT?
SHEESH!
The STATION OF THE WHITE HANKY DOGMA
OF INFINITE OBTUSENESS STRIKES FROM THE VATICAN YET AGAIN!