Replies

If you're going to attempt to debate the Scriptures it would probably help to read them a bit.. The Shavouts/Pentecost argument you made was so childishly wrong that no wonder you dropped it
and started s commentary on Paul.
Once again you again you make statements that are outlandish and that you should have known better than to make. Remember? Here is the record:

Mark: Show me where Paul quotes God except for the three verses in Acts 9. Show me where Paul quotes God in support of any of his writings.

C-Y-C: First of all I don't respond well to commands like “Show me....Show me...”, But I'll overlook it since it takes so little effort. You can go to Hebrews where Paul is positively effusive with quotes from God in support of his writings, Chapter 3, 4, and 8 make a good start.
Or maybe 2 Cor. chapter 12 where God tell Paul that Paul is going to have to deal with his infirmity. He makes a direct quote in vs. 9.

C-Y-C: Let's indeed go to heart of the matter. Paul doesn't support the teachings of the Catholic church so he's “incomplete” or lacking “quotes” or some other fabricated deficiency. Isn't THAT the “heart of the matter”?

And now you want someone to find in Paul's writings a creed he doesn't discuss (it was devised long after his death) in a predictable and predicted fashion

C-Y-C: Next it will be: “Except for THOSE verses show me where.....”

If you want to start a thread on the Catholic doctrine of the trinity, it's Biblical basis or lack thereof, do so and I'll be right there. But like I said, I don't respond well to being told what to do just to satisfy you.

The heart of the matter is Paul doesn't support the teachings of the Catholic church therefore he is suspect.

Start a thread if you want but don't think I'm going to jump through hoops you erect.