Replies

If you're going to attempt to debate the Scriptures it would probably help to read them a bit.. The Shavouts/Pentecost argument you made was so childishly wrong that no wonder you dropped it
and started s commentary on Paul.
Once again you again you make statements that are outlandish and that you should have known better than to make. Remember? Here is the record:

Mark: Show me where Paul quotes God except for the three verses in Acts 9. Show me where Paul quotes God in support of any of his writings.

C-Y-C: First of all I don't respond well to commands like “Show me....Show me...”, But I'll overlook it since it takes so little effort. You can go to Hebrews where Paul is positively effusive with quotes from God in support of his writings, Chapter 3, 4, and 8 make a good start.
Or maybe 2 Cor. chapter 12 where God tell Paul that Paul is going to have to deal with his infirmity. He makes a direct quote in vs. 9.

C-Y-C: Let's indeed go to heart of the matter. Paul doesn't support the teachings of the Catholic church so he's “incomplete” or lacking “quotes” or some other fabricated deficiency. Isn't THAT the “heart of the matter”?

And now you want someone to find in Paul's writings a creed he doesn't discuss (it was devised long after his death) in a predictable and predicted fashion

C-Y-C: Next it will be: “Except for THOSE verses show me where.....”

If you want to start a thread on the Catholic doctrine of the trinity, it's Biblical basis or lack thereof, do so and I'll be right there. But like I said, I don't respond well to being told what to do just to satisfy you.

The heart of the matter is Paul doesn't support the teachings of the Catholic church therefore he is suspect.

Start a thread if you want but don't think I'm going to jump through hoops you erect.

Please help me to understand just what Mark wants. Is he wanting the *it takes 3 witnessess to bear confirmation*? What WHAT does he want? Do you know, exactly? I can't make clear sense of his foggy questions. I would ask him, but I would get more foggy questions. Mark, if you want to clearly and succinctly form your questions to us, please do. Please.

If you're going to attempt to debate the Scriptures it would probably help to read them a bit.. The Shavouts/Pentecost argument you made was so childishly wrong that no wonder you dropped it and started s commentary on Paul.

Wrong again. The Feast of the Sheaves is Jewish and Pentecost is Christian. Just as the Passover is Jewish and the Eucharist is Christian. I showed that and you had the grace to disappear at that point.

C-Y-C: First of all I don't respond well to commands like “Show me....Show me...”,

Then don't.

You can go to Hebrews where Paul is positively effusive with quotes from God in support of his writings, Chapter 3, 4, and 8 make a good start.

Who says Paul wrote Hebrews? At any rate, pull up direct quotes from God that support specific Pauline Trinitarian verses, if you please.

And now you want someone to find in Paul's writings a creed he doesn't discuss (it was devised long after his death) in a predictable and predicted fashion

Applause!!!!! Very good!!!! What I was looking for. All the Protestants here are shaking with anger that I would dare say such a thing. Now, let me ask you if YOU believe in the Nicene Creed.

The heart of the matter is Paul doesn't support the teachings of the Catholic church therefore he is suspect.

There we have not gotten through yet. Paul is not suspect. He is one of the two greatest Apostles. It is only misinterpretation of his writings that have led so many astray.

I congratulate you very much. You have realized something and posted it.