The implication was that Christ needed to be tempted in order to understand us. That is a big big negative. God knows all and was, is and will ever be. He knows all. God did not have to be tempted to understand temptation. You guys have a rather interesting view of God.
God made Paul the primary teacher of the new church, Paul wrote exactly what the Holy Spirit inspired him to . If anyone has a problem with that..that is their eternal problem
I'd like you to stand back and look at this statement. This is a very good demonstration of what is wrong with the children of the Reformation. The primary teacher of the early Church (for three years) was Christ. Paul was a teacher. And bishop. But never a primary bishop. Does that gall those who worship Paul?
You guys know so little about the scriptures...
Paul was not a bishop...Paul was an Apostle...Paul was THE Apostle of the adoption...That doesn't sound primary to you???
I'd like you to stand back and look at this statement. This is a very good demonstration of what is wrong with the children of the Reformation. The primary teacher of the early Church (for three years) was Christ.
The church wasn't mentioned by Jesus til Matthew 16...And then Jesus spoke of it as a future operation...
That's why the Reformation took place...You guys are telling the same stories that your religion told before the scriptures were revealed to the common people...
Thanks but no thanks...We have the God breathed scriptures that cuts your religion off at the knees...