One of them (who is now a professor at BYU) used to cite McConkie all the time when it suited his purposes, but would abandon him at the drop of a hat (once even calling McConkie "that clown") if the doctrine was the least bit embarassing to LDS.
Was is THIS fellow?
Timeline... Subject...
0:59 "Anti-Mormons..."
1:16 "ATTACK the faith you have..."
2:02 "We really aren't obligated to answer everyone's questions..."
3:57 "You already know MORE about God and Christ and the plan of salvation than any who would ATTACK you."
No. That's not the one. I haven't seen my friend in about 10 years but I'm guessing that the hairline is now the same.
"We really aren't obligated to answer everyone's questions..."
Of course. I mean, what does the Apostle Peter know anyway? "Be ready always to give an answer for the hope that lies within us" apparently doesn't apply for Mormons. No wonder Mormons are troubled by the Bible - it is just too easy to refute them by knowing your Bible.
"You already know MORE about God and Christ and the plan of salvation than any who would ATTACK you."
Boy, unless this guy repents, he is in for an eternal surprise. Is there anything more chilling than the thought of Jesus looking at you and saying: "Depart from me, I never knew you"?
I could only take a little bit of this nonsense but I get the idea that because Mormons face opposition on the BOM, temple activities, the true "church", etc., their message must be true in this guy's opinion. How convenient! If you support my idea, I'm right and if you oppose my ideas, it proves I'm right.
