Skip to comments.
Radio Replies Second Volume - The Idealization of Protestantism
Celledoor.com ^
| 1940
| Fathers Rumble & Carty
Posted on 05/08/2010 9:30:27 PM PDT by GonzoII
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 361-375 next last
To: Binghamton_native
Say what you will about spamming and bloviating, but, just the list of historical changes makes an interesting commentary to claims or assumptions regarding the unchanging nature of the Church Or might, if it were accurate, and not from a hate site. Don't you wonder why there is no link to that spam?
To: Natural Law
There’s been enough murdering in the name of Christianity on both sides.
82
posted on
05/09/2010 9:40:47 AM PDT
by
marajade
(Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
To: narses
Posted from a hate site. Ugly nasty halftruthes designed to draw people away from God. And you praise this?
And the very message that started this whole thread was not built upon hate and lies targeting Protestants?
Give me a break, the site the list came from was not a hate site. Am I now am to believe that anyone who proves a point is full of hate.
Proves my point as to why many Catholics vote Democrat. The MSM and the Democrat party do the same thing to anyone who proves they are wrong.
All of a sudden the truth is claimed to be hate speech and slander.
Yup sounds like Democrats to me.
83
posted on
05/09/2010 9:41:35 AM PDT
by
OneVike
(I am Chuck Wolk, a Freeper in Christ since February of 1998)
To: Natural Law
“The Bible, as wonderful as it is, does not contain 100% of the revealed Word.”
And just where did you come up with this opinion?
84
posted on
05/09/2010 9:42:03 AM PDT
by
marajade
(Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
To: My hearts in London - Everett
Interesting how they are the ones to run to the MODs. Who cannot stand to hear the truth? Remember who started this, it was not us. We are defending ourselves here and we get called names and have our comments pulled.
Yup, sounds like liberals to me.
85
posted on
05/09/2010 9:44:16 AM PDT
by
OneVike
(I am Chuck Wolk, a Freeper in Christ since February of 1998)
To: Judith Anne
I’m not anti-Catholic.
I just don’t believe they practice what they teach. I hold that same opinion about many other religious organizations.
86
posted on
05/09/2010 9:45:49 AM PDT
by
marajade
(Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
To: OneVike
Call a waaaaaaaambulance. Alternatively, learn the rules and follow them.
To: narses; Judith Anne
88
posted on
05/09/2010 9:49:48 AM PDT
by
marajade
(Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
To: Judith Anne; OneVike
My point had to do with the list of changes that have come about in two centuries. Regardless of the source, surely you wouldn’t quarrel with many of the items which are historical events, e.g., the Immaculate Conception was declared on such and such a date, right?
To: SnakeDoctor
sorry should have pinged you to my last post
90
posted on
05/09/2010 9:50:54 AM PDT
by
marajade
(Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
To: sabe@q.com
Im not anti-Catholic. It is a sin to bear false witness.
Comment #92 Removed by Moderator
To: OneVike; Judith Anne
Yes, OneVike, I’m noticing who exactly is acting Christ-like on this thread. Didn’t He practice love, forgiveness, and the whole thing about removing the plank from your own eye before trying to see clearly the speck in your brother’s eye? What happened to brotherly love? If Catholics believe Protestants are wrong in their theology, what do they gain by attacking instead of trying to convince through love?
93
posted on
05/09/2010 9:55:35 AM PDT
by
My hearts in London - Everett
(So the writer who breeds more words than he needs, is making a chore for the reader who reads.)
To: Binghamton_native
My apology, my post was unclear.
Let me rephrase that:
I am not interest in discussing an item from spam. These sidebars are often unproductive.
There. I’ll ask to have the other one deleted.
To: sabe@q.com
"And just where did you come up with this opinion?"All I needed to prove it was a single piece of non-biblical evidence of the Word. In my 50+ years of study I have encountered many, many.
To: OneVike
More cut and paste? Got a source? Otherwise, feh!
To: Natural Law
So you don’t believe that John 1:1 is the truth in your nearly 50+ years of study?
97
posted on
05/09/2010 10:00:31 AM PDT
by
marajade
(Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
To: Persevero
I was just reading the account of Saul praying to the dead Samuel last night as a matter of fact. Sin. As far as being forbidden to contact the dead, see Leviticus 19:31:
Do not turn to mediums or necromancers; do not seek them out, and so make yourselves unclean by them: I am the LORD your God."
This is what Saul was doing.
1 Samuel 28 deals with Saul contacting a witch, who he asked to summon up the spirit of the prophet Samuel (whether this really *was* Samuel, or, witches being witches, a deceiving spirit masquerading as Samuel, I don't know). Saul asked Samuel to give him advice (v. 15):
"And Samuel said to Saul, Why hast thou disquieted me, to bring me up? And Saul answered, I am sore distressed; for the Philistines make war against me, and God is departed from me, and answereth me no more, neither by prophets, nor by dreams: therefore I have called thee, that thou mayest make known unto me what I shall do."
So Saul was consorting with a witch for the purposes of asking someone for advice: which is not the same as asking a fellow believer (who has gone on to Heaven, presumably) , to pray *to GOD* on your behalf.
Cheers!
98
posted on
05/09/2010 10:03:54 AM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: sabe@q.com
"So you dont believe that John 1:1 is the truth in your nearly 50+ years of study?"How did you get that I don't believe in the Word when I stated that not 100% of the Word is contained in the Bible and where did you get that it was?
To: moder_ator; Judith Anne; Natural Law; Arthur McGowan; vladimir998; roamer_1; c-b 1; ...
Dear religiuous Moderator
One cannot set up a rule that says no one can attack another on a thread who's very article at question is attacking half of the Freepers who claim to be Protestant. However, if that is the case then next Sunday I will post an apologetically laden article about the heretical practices of the Catholic religion and its followers. Also I will demand that no one be able to deny my facts, nor post anything I find objectionable.
To those who deny the truths I have posted as comments which were deleted.
It is a bigger sin to deny the truth. For Christ is the truth and the truth will set you free.
Jesus *said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me.John 14:6
If that is an attack, then remove this comment and I will cease to discuss this matter on this thread anymore today.
100
posted on
05/09/2010 10:10:17 AM PDT
by
OneVike
(I am Chuck Wolk, a Freeper in Christ since February of 1998)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 361-375 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson